CHRT.L vs. RR.L
CHRT.L (Cohort plc) and RR.L (Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC) are both stocks. Both operate in the Aerospace & Defense industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, CHRT.L returned 16.50%/yr vs 20.45%/yr for RR.L. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CHRT.L vs. RR.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHRT.L achieves a 41.48% return, which is significantly higher than RR.L's 9.96% return. Over the past 10 years, CHRT.L has underperformed RR.L with an annualized return of 16.50%, while RR.L has yielded a comparatively higher 20.45% annualized return.
CHRT.L
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 13.12%
- YTD
- 41.48%
- 6M
- 16.66%
- 1Y
- -18.45%
- 3Y*
- 40.70%
- 5Y*
- 18.11%
- 10Y*
- 16.50%
RR.L
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 3.21%
- YTD
- 9.96%
- 6M
- 14.23%
- 1Y
- 43.48%
- 3Y*
- 104.71%
- 5Y*
- 62.63%
- 10Y*
- 20.45%
CHRT.L vs. RR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHRT.L Cohort plc | 41.48% | -15.64% | 99.97% | 13.45% | -3.81% | -14.13% | -10.63% | 94.12% | 14.53% | -15.82% |
RR.L Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC | 9.96% | 104.79% | 89.72% | 221.57% | -24.15% | 10.45% | -52.55% | -16.52% | -0.63% | 27.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHRT.L and RR.L is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2006 | 0.08 |
Over the past year, CHRT.L and RR.L have become more correlated (0.35) than their long-term average of 0.08, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
CHRT.L:
£593.44M
RR.L:
£105.78B
CHRT.L:
£0.81
RR.L:
£0.99
CHRT.L:
15.76
RR.L:
12.70
CHRT.L:
0.41
RR.L:
0.03
CHRT.L:
1.17
RR.L:
2.65
CHRT.L:
3.59
RR.L:
38.81
CHRT.L:
£507.09M
RR.L:
£40.12B
CHRT.L:
£152.43M
RR.L:
£10.12B
CHRT.L:
£68.05M
RR.L:
£9.20B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHRT.L vs. RR.L — Risk / Return Rank
CHRT.L
RR.L
CHRT.L vs. RR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohort plc (CHRT.L) and Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHRT.L | RR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.23 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.38 | 2.27 | -2.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.66 | 6.34 | -7.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHRT.L | RR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.37 | 1.21 | -1.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 1.49 | -1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.42 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 0.29 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
CHRT.L vs. RR.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHRT.L drawdown since its inception was -99.28%, which is greater than RR.L's maximum drawdown of -90.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHRT.L and RR.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHRT.L | RR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.28% | -90.25% | -9.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.22% | -19.04% | -29.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.22% | -21.78% | -26.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.22% | -55.09% | +6.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.22% | -89.41% | +41.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.72% | -7.22% | -72.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -78.74% | -28.29% | -50.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.78% | 6.84% | +20.94% |
Volatility
CHRT.L vs. RR.L - Volatility Comparison
Cohort plc (CHRT.L) has a higher volatility of 20.37% compared to Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L) at 11.59%. This indicates that CHRT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHRT.L | RR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.37% | 11.59% | +8.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.53% | 30.80% | +5.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.97% | 35.96% | +14.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.91% | 42.02% | -1.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.02% | 48.59% | -13.57% |
Dividends
CHRT.L vs. RR.L - Dividend Comparison
CHRT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, more than RR.L's 0.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHRT.L Cohort plc | 1.32% | 1.80% | 1.36% | 2.41% | 2.43% | 1.42% | 2.15% | 1.26% | 2.16% | 2.09% | 1.46% | 1.31% |
RR.L Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC | 0.75% | 0.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.71% | 1.41% | 0.54% | 1.75% | 4.06% |
Financials
CHRT.L vs. RR.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cohort plc and Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CHRT.L vs. RR.L - Profitability Comparison
CHRT.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cohort plc reported a gross profit of 35.06M and revenue of 128.82M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.2%.
RR.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC reported a gross profit of 3.21B and revenue of 11.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.
CHRT.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cohort plc reported an operating income of 8.20M and revenue of 128.82M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.4%.
RR.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC reported an operating income of 3.25B and revenue of 11.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.
CHRT.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cohort plc reported a net income of 6.11M and revenue of 128.82M, resulting in a net margin of 4.8%.
RR.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC reported a net income of 1.43B and revenue of 11.72B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CHRT.L and RR.L have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CHRT.L and RR.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer