CHKP vs. ZS
CHKP (Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.) and ZS (Zscaler, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Software - Infrastructure industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 5 years, CHKP returned 1.55%/yr vs -7.99%/yr for ZS. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CHKP vs. ZS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHKP achieves a -30.33% return, which is significantly higher than ZS's -42.54% return.
CHKP
- 1D
- -4.82%
- 1M
- 12.49%
- YTD
- -30.33%
- 6M
- -32.26%
- 1Y
- -44.63%
- 3Y*
- 0.82%
- 5Y*
- 1.55%
- 10Y*
- 4.36%
ZS
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- -15.04%
- YTD
- -42.54%
- 6M
- -47.22%
- 1Y
- -57.35%
- 3Y*
- -5.02%
- 5Y*
- -7.99%
- 10Y*
- —
CHKP vs. ZS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHKP Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. | -30.33% | -0.61% | 22.19% | 21.11% | 8.24% | -12.30% | 19.78% | 8.10% | -0.91% |
ZS Zscaler, Inc. | -42.54% | 24.67% | -18.57% | 98.00% | -65.18% | 60.90% | 329.48% | 18.59% | 18.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHKP and ZS is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2018 | 0.38 |
Fundamentals
CHKP:
$13.72B
ZS:
$20.78B
CHKP:
$9.74
ZS:
-$0.49
CHKP:
5.09
ZS:
6.47
CHKP:
4.87
ZS:
8.78
CHKP:
$2.76B
ZS:
$3.17B
CHKP:
$2.34B
ZS:
$2.43B
CHKP:
$965.90M
ZS:
$69.08M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHKP vs. ZS — Risk / Return Rank
CHKP
ZS
CHKP vs. ZS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. (CHKP) and Zscaler, Inc. (ZS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHKP | ZS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 0.79 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | -0.89 | +0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.73 | -1.59 | -0.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHKP | ZS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.17 | -0.98 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | -0.14 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.31 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
CHKP vs. ZS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHKP drawdown since its inception was -89.31%, which is greater than ZS's maximum drawdown of -76.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHKP and ZS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHKP | ZS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.31% | -76.41% | -12.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.36% | -64.89% | +13.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.83% | -64.89% | +13.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.83% | -76.41% | +24.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.63% | -64.95% | +20.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.58% | -32.63% | -8.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.41% | 36.05% | -9.64% |
Volatility
CHKP vs. ZS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. (CHKP) is 10.62%, while Zscaler, Inc. (ZS) has a volatility of 44.44%. This indicates that CHKP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHKP | ZS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.62% | 44.44% | -33.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.57% | 57.30% | -24.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.27% | 58.72% | -20.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.65% | 56.10% | -28.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.08% | 58.42% | -32.34% |
Dividends
CHKP vs. ZS - Dividend Comparison
Neither CHKP nor ZS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
CHKP vs. ZS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. and Zscaler, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CHKP vs. ZS - Profitability Comparison
CHKP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. reported a gross profit of 568.30M and revenue of 668.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 85.0%.
ZS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zscaler, Inc. reported a gross profit of 657.82M and revenue of 850.48M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.4%.
CHKP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. reported an operating income of 185.10M and revenue of 668.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.
ZS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zscaler, Inc. reported an operating income of -29.64M and revenue of 850.48M, resulting in an operating margin of -3.5%.
CHKP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. reported a net income of 191.60M and revenue of 668.40M, resulting in a net margin of 28.7%.
ZS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zscaler, Inc. reported a net income of -13.88M and revenue of 850.48M, resulting in a net margin of -1.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CHKP and ZS have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZS has higher volatility (44.44%) compared to CHKP (10.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHKP dropped -89.31% vs ZS's -76.41%.
ZS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.98 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHKP and ZS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer