PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHKP vs. CYBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CHKP vs. CYBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. (CHKP) and CyberArk Software Ltd. (CYBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CHKP

1D
-4.82%
1M
12.49%
YTD
-30.33%
6M
-32.26%
1Y
-44.63%
3Y*
0.82%
5Y*
1.55%
10Y*
4.36%

CYBR

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHKP vs. CYBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CHKP
Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
-30.33%-0.61%22.19%21.11%8.24%-12.30%19.78%8.10%-0.94%22.69%
CYBR
CyberArk Software Ltd.
-8.34%33.89%52.09%68.95%-25.18%7.23%38.61%57.24%79.13%-9.03%

Correlation

The correlation between CHKP and CYBR is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2014

0.39

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CHKP:

$13.72B

CYBR:

$20.69B

EPS

CHKP:

$9.74

CYBR:

-$2.92

PS Ratio

CHKP:

5.09

CYBR:

15.13

PB Ratio

CHKP:

4.87

CYBR:

8.61

Total Revenue (TTM)

CHKP:

$2.76B

CYBR:

$1.36B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CHKP:

$2.34B

CYBR:

$1.01B

EBITDA (TTM)

CHKP:

$965.90M

CYBR:

$59.13M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHKP vs. CYBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHKP
CHKP Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
CHKP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHKP Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHKP Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
CHKP Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHKP Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

CYBR
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHKP vs. CYBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. (CHKP) and CyberArk Software Ltd. (CYBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CHKPCYBRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.77

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.73

CHKP vs. CYBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CHKPCYBRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

Drawdowns

CHKP vs. CYBR - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHKPCYBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-44.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.41%

Volatility

CHKP vs. CYBR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHKPCYBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.08%

Dividends

CHKP vs. CYBR - Dividend Comparison

Neither CHKP nor CYBR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CHKP vs. CYBR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. and CyberArk Software Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M700.00M20222023202420252026
668.40M
372.65M
(CHKP) Total Revenue
(CYBR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CHKP vs. CYBR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. and CyberArk Software Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

70.0%75.0%80.0%85.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
85.0%
71.7%
Portfolio components
CHKP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. reported a gross profit of 568.30M and revenue of 668.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 85.0%.

CYBR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CyberArk Software Ltd. reported a gross profit of 267.25M and revenue of 372.65M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.7%.

CHKP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. reported an operating income of 185.10M and revenue of 668.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.

CYBR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CyberArk Software Ltd. reported an operating income of 1.75M and revenue of 372.65M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.5%.

CHKP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. reported a net income of 191.60M and revenue of 668.40M, resulting in a net margin of 28.7%.

CYBR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CyberArk Software Ltd. reported a net income of -17.11M and revenue of 372.65M, resulting in a net margin of -4.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CHKP and CYBR have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHKP and CYBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer