CHAT vs. LNVGY
CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) is Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while LNVGY (Lenovo Group Limited) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, CHAT returned 50.33%/yr vs 54.06%/yr for LNVGY. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CHAT vs. LNVGY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHAT achieves a 58.75% return, which is significantly lower than LNVGY's 165.39% return.
CHAT
- 1D
- 3.25%
- 1M
- 8.61%
- YTD
- 58.75%
- 6M
- 54.05%
- 1Y
- 117.08%
- 3Y*
- 50.33%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LNVGY
- 1D
- 4.73%
- 1M
- 95.25%
- YTD
- 165.39%
- 6M
- 147.91%
- 1Y
- 179.63%
- 3Y*
- 54.06%
- 5Y*
- 26.98%
- 10Y*
- 24.58%
CHAT vs. LNVGY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 58.75% | 49.85% | 30.98% | 19.23% |
LNVGY Lenovo Group Limited | 165.39% | -4.37% | -4.30% | 45.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHAT and LNVGY is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2023 | 0.38 |
The correlation between CHAT and LNVGY shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (3 years) to 0.52 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHAT vs. LNVGY — Risk / Return Rank
CHAT
LNVGY
CHAT vs. LNVGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) and Lenovo Group Limited (LNVGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHAT | LNVGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.62 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.23 | 6.21 | +1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.00 | 11.66 | +9.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHAT | LNVGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.63 | 3.78 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.78 | 0.30 | +1.48 |
Drawdowns
CHAT vs. LNVGY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHAT drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum LNVGY drawdown of -84.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHAT and LNVGY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHAT | LNVGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.34% | -84.37% | +53.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.28% | -29.12% | +12.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.34% | -44.60% | +13.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -55.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -55.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.52% | -6.30% | -3.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.36% | -35.39% | +30.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.60% | 15.48% | -9.88% |
Volatility
CHAT vs. LNVGY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) is 15.95%, while Lenovo Group Limited (LNVGY) has a volatility of 31.85%. This indicates that CHAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LNVGY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHAT | LNVGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.95% | 31.85% | -15.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.06% | 39.70% | -12.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.47% | 47.98% | -15.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.45% | 46.33% | -15.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.45% | 40.61% | -10.16% |
Dividends
CHAT vs. LNVGY - Dividend Comparison
CHAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, more than LNVGY's 1.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 1.80% | 2.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LNVGY Lenovo Group Limited | 1.59% | 4.21% | 3.83% | 3.47% | 5.98% | 3.58% | 3.77% | 5.21% | 4.74% | 10.40% | 10.61% | 3.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHAT and LNVGY have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LNVGY has higher volatility (31.85%) compared to CHAT (15.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHAT dropped -31.34% vs LNVGY's -84.37%.
LNVGY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.78 vs 3.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHAT and LNVGY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer