CHAT vs. COPX
CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) and COPX (Global X Copper Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CHAT is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while COPX is a Materials fund tracking the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. CHAT is actively managed, while COPX is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CHAT returned 50.33%/yr vs 32.33%/yr for COPX. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CHAT charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for COPX.
Performance
CHAT vs. COPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHAT achieves a 58.75% return, which is significantly higher than COPX's 13.23% return.
CHAT
- 1D
- 3.25%
- 1M
- 8.61%
- YTD
- 58.75%
- 6M
- 54.05%
- 1Y
- 117.08%
- 3Y*
- 50.33%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COPX
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- -5.44%
- YTD
- 13.23%
- 6M
- 23.36%
- 1Y
- 93.73%
- 3Y*
- 32.33%
- 5Y*
- 18.13%
- 10Y*
- 20.76%
CHAT vs. COPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 58.75% | 49.85% | 30.98% | 21.04% |
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 13.23% | 93.50% | 3.57% | 1.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHAT and COPX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2023 | 0.50 |
The correlation between CHAT and COPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
CHAT vs. COPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CHAT
COPX
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
CHAT
COPX
-
Communication Services
CHAT
COPX
-
Consumer Cyclical
CHAT
COPX
-
Industrials
CHAT
COPX
Financial Services
CHAT
COPX
-
Basic Materials
CHAT
-
COPX
Consumer Defensive
CHAT
-
COPX
-
Energy
CHAT
-
COPX
-
Healthcare
CHAT
-
COPX
-
Real Estate
CHAT
-
COPX
-
Utilities
CHAT
-
COPX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHAT vs. COPX — Risk / Return Rank
CHAT
COPX
CHAT vs. COPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHAT | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.34 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.23 | 3.39 | +3.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.00 | 10.72 | +10.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHAT | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.63 | 2.20 | +1.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.78 | 0.17 | +1.61 |
Drawdowns
CHAT vs. COPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHAT drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum COPX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHAT and COPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHAT | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.34% | -83.16% | +51.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.28% | -27.82% | +11.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.34% | -39.72% | +8.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -42.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -65.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.52% | -15.06% | +5.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.36% | -39.28% | +33.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.60% | 8.78% | -3.18% |
Volatility
CHAT vs. COPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) is 15.95%, while Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) has a volatility of 18.19%. This indicates that CHAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHAT | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.95% | 18.19% | -2.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.06% | 37.27% | -10.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.47% | 42.89% | -10.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.45% | 36.80% | -6.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.45% | 35.68% | -5.23% |
CHAT vs. COPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHAT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than COPX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
CHAT vs. COPX - Dividend Comparison
CHAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, less than COPX's 2.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 1.80% | 2.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 2.36% | 2.68% | 1.80% | 2.39% | 3.14% | 1.48% | 1.30% | 1.37% | 2.59% | 1.57% | 0.60% | 1.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHAT and COPX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COPX has higher volatility (18.19%) compared to CHAT (15.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHAT dropped -31.34% vs COPX's -83.16%.
On 3-year performance, CHAT leads with 50.33% vs 32.33% for COPX. On fees, COPX is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, CHAT has been the lower-risk option at 15.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CHAT has performed better with a 50.33% return vs 32.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COPX is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CHAT.
COPX has the higher dividend yield at 2.36%, compared with 1.80% for CHAT.
CHAT is categorized as Technology Equities, while COPX is Materials. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CHAT and 0.65% for COPX.
CHAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.63 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHAT and COPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer