CHAT vs. CGNX

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) is Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while CGNX (Cognex Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, CHAT returned 50.33%/yr vs 4.89%/yr for CGNX. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CHAT vs. CGNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) and Cognex Corporation (CGNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHAT achieves a 58.75% return, which is significantly lower than CGNX's 73.89% return.

CHAT

• 1D: 3.25%
• 1M: 8.61%
• YTD: 58.75%
• 6M: 54.05%
• 1Y: 117.08%
• 3Y*: 50.33%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CGNX

• 1D: 2.58%
• 1M: -4.85%
• YTD: 73.89%
• 6M: 62.85%
• 1Y: 107.46%
• 3Y*: 4.89%
• 5Y*: -3.98%
• 10Y*: 11.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHAT vs. CGNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	58.75%	49.85%	30.98%	19.23%
CGNX Cognex Corporation	73.89%	1.24%	-13.45%	-19.76%

Correlation

The correlation between CHAT and CGNX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2023	0.49

Return for Risk

CHAT vs. CGNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHAT

CHAT Risk / Return Rank: 93
CHAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
CHAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
CHAT Omega Ratio Rank: 91
CHAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
CHAT Martin Ratio Rank: 92

CGNX

CGNX Risk / Return Rank: 88
CGNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
CGNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
CGNX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
CGNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
CGNX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHAT vs. CGNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) and Cognex Corporation (CGNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CHAT	CGNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.63	1.87	+1.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.82	3.15	+0.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	1.42	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.23	3.88	+3.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.00	8.76	+12.23
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CHAT vs. CGNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHAT Sharpe Ratio is 3.63, which is higher than the CGNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHAT and CGNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CHAT	CGNX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.63	1.87	+1.77
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.09	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.29	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.78	0.28	+1.50

Drawdowns

CHAT vs. CGNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHAT drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum CGNX drawdown of -83.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHAT and CGNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHAT	CGNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.34%	-83.71%	+52.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.28%	-27.86%	+11.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.34%	-59.98%	+28.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-74.07%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-74.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.52%	-31.35%	+21.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.36%	-37.52%	+32.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.60%	12.31%	-6.71%

Volatility

CHAT vs. CGNX - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) has a higher volatility of 15.95% compared to Cognex Corporation (CGNX) at 13.16%. This indicates that CHAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHAT	CGNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.95%	13.16%	+2.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.06%	42.07%	-15.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.47%	58.00%	-25.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.45%	43.52%	-13.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.45%	41.85%	-11.40%

Dividends

CHAT vs. CGNX - Dividend Comparison

CHAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, more than CGNX's 0.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CGNX Cognex Corporation	0.54%	0.90%	0.85%	0.68%	0.56%	0.32%	2.77%	0.37%	0.48%	0.27%	0.46%	0.62%
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	1.80%	2.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CHAT and CGNX in my portfolio?

CHAT and CGNX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CHAT or CGNX?

CHAT has higher volatility (15.95%) compared to CGNX (13.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHAT dropped -31.34% vs CGNX's -83.71%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.63 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.