CGDV vs. SPYM
CGDV (Capital Group Dividend Value ETF) and SPYM (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group, while SPYM is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. CGDV is actively managed, while SPYM is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CGDV returned 24.27%/yr vs 21.46%/yr for SPYM. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CGDV charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for SPYM.
Performance
CGDV vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGDV achieves a 10.15% return, which is significantly higher than SPYM's 8.75% return.
CGDV
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 1.46%
- YTD
- 10.15%
- 6M
- 10.88%
- 1Y
- 27.58%
- 3Y*
- 24.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPYM
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 8.75%
- 6M
- 8.78%
- 1Y
- 24.91%
- 3Y*
- 21.46%
- 5Y*
- 13.50%
- 10Y*
- 15.40%
CGDV vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | 10.15% | 25.50% | 20.10% | 28.81% | -0.44% |
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 8.75% | 17.79% | 25.00% | 26.24% | -7.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGDV and SPYM is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022 | 0.92 |
The correlation between CGDV and SPYM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
CGDV vs. SPYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CGDV
SPYM
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
CGDV
SPYM
Industrials
CGDV
SPYM
Healthcare
CGDV
SPYM
Consumer Cyclical
CGDV
SPYM
Communication Services
CGDV
SPYM
Financial Services
CGDV
SPYM
Consumer Defensive
CGDV
SPYM
Energy
CGDV
SPYM
Basic Materials
CGDV
SPYM
Utilities
CGDV
SPYM
Real Estate
CGDV
SPYM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGDV vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank
CGDV
SPYM
CGDV vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CGDV | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.38 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.84 | 2.81 | +0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.37 | 12.97 | +0.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CGDV | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.34 | 2.08 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.21 | 0.61 | +0.60 |
Drawdowns
CGDV vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGDV drawdown since its inception was -21.82%, smaller than the maximum SPYM drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGDV and SPYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGDV | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.82% | -54.46% | +32.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.75% | -8.90% | -0.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.28% | -18.72% | +4.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.22% | -2.66% | +0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.61% | -7.15% | +3.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | 1.92% | +0.15% |
Volatility
CGDV vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) have volatilities of 3.60% and 3.72%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGDV | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.60% | 3.72% | -0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.47% | 9.30% | +0.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.85% | 12.07% | -0.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.51% | 16.84% | -1.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.51% | 18.02% | -2.51% |
CGDV vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGDV has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
CGDV vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison
CGDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, more than SPYM's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | 1.19% | 1.29% | 1.60% | 1.65% | 1.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 1.02% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.79% | 2.23% | 1.75% | 1.97% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGDV and SPYM have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPYM has higher volatility (3.72%) compared to CGDV (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGDV dropped -21.82% vs SPYM's -54.46%.
On 3-year performance, CGDV leads with 24.27% vs 21.46% for SPYM. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, CGDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CGDV has performed better with a 24.27% return vs 21.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CGDV.
CGDV has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 1.02% for SPYM.
CGDV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SPYM is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CGDV and 0.02% for SPYM.
CGDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CGDV and SPYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer