CGDV vs. SPYD
CGDV (Capital Group Dividend Value ETF) and SPYD (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group, while SPYD is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 High Dividend Index. CGDV is actively managed, while SPYD is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CGDV returned 24.27%/yr vs 13.94%/yr for SPYD. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CGDV charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for SPYD.
Performance
CGDV vs. SPYD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGDV achieves a 10.15% return, which is significantly lower than SPYD's 11.34% return.
CGDV
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 1.46%
- YTD
- 10.15%
- 6M
- 10.88%
- 1Y
- 27.58%
- 3Y*
- 24.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPYD
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 2.10%
- YTD
- 11.34%
- 6M
- 13.02%
- 1Y
- 17.47%
- 3Y*
- 13.94%
- 5Y*
- 7.02%
- 10Y*
- 8.65%
CGDV vs. SPYD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | 10.15% | 25.50% | 20.10% | 28.81% | -2.89% |
SPYD State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF | 11.34% | 4.65% | 15.34% | 3.91% | -0.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGDV and SPYD is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022 | 0.72 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CGDV and SPYD has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
CGDV vs. SPYD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CGDV
SPYD
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
CGDV
SPYD
Industrials
CGDV
SPYD
Healthcare
CGDV
SPYD
Consumer Cyclical
CGDV
SPYD
Communication Services
CGDV
SPYD
Financial Services
CGDV
SPYD
Consumer Defensive
CGDV
SPYD
Energy
CGDV
SPYD
Basic Materials
CGDV
SPYD
Utilities
CGDV
SPYD
Real Estate
CGDV
SPYD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGDV vs. SPYD — Risk / Return Rank
CGDV
SPYD
CGDV vs. SPYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CGDV | SPYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.26 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.84 | 2.49 | +0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.37 | 7.22 | +6.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CGDV | SPYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.34 | 1.51 | +0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.21 | 0.47 | +0.73 |
Drawdowns
CGDV vs. SPYD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGDV drawdown since its inception was -21.82%, smaller than the maximum SPYD drawdown of -46.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGDV and SPYD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGDV | SPYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.82% | -46.42% | +24.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.75% | -7.05% | -2.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.28% | -16.13% | +1.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.22% | -0.48% | -1.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.61% | -6.16% | +2.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | 2.42% | -0.35% |
Volatility
CGDV vs. SPYD - Volatility Comparison
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) has a higher volatility of 3.60% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD) at 2.68%. This indicates that CGDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGDV | SPYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.60% | 2.68% | +0.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.47% | 7.74% | +1.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.85% | 11.65% | +0.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.51% | 16.14% | -0.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.51% | 19.78% | -4.27% |
CGDV vs. SPYD - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGDV has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYD's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
CGDV vs. SPYD - Dividend Comparison
CGDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, less than SPYD's 4.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | 1.19% | 1.29% | 1.60% | 1.65% | 1.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYD State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF | 4.17% | 4.52% | 4.31% | 4.66% | 5.01% | 3.68% | 4.95% | 4.42% | 4.75% | 4.63% | 4.34% | 1.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGDV and SPYD have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CGDV has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to SPYD (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGDV dropped -21.82% vs SPYD's -46.42%.
On 3-year performance, CGDV leads with 24.27% vs 13.94% for SPYD. On fees, SPYD is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, SPYD has been the lower-risk option at 2.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CGDV has performed better with a 24.27% return vs 13.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYD is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CGDV.
SPYD has the higher dividend yield at 4.17%, compared with 1.19% for CGDV.
CGDV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SPYD is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CGDV and 0.07% for SPYD.
CGDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CGDV and SPYD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer