CGDV vs. SMR
CGDV (Capital Group Dividend Value ETF) is Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group, while SMR (NuScale Power Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, CGDV returned 24.27%/yr vs 10.94%/yr for SMR. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CGDV vs. SMR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGDV achieves a 10.15% return, which is significantly higher than SMR's -24.06% return.
CGDV
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 1.46%
- YTD
- 10.15%
- 6M
- 10.88%
- 1Y
- 27.58%
- 3Y*
- 24.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMR
- 1D
- 2.48%
- 1M
- -14.26%
- YTD
- -24.06%
- 6M
- -50.09%
- 1Y
- -68.68%
- 3Y*
- 10.94%
- 5Y*
- 1.52%
- 10Y*
- —
CGDV vs. SMR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | 10.15% | 25.50% | 20.10% | 28.81% | -2.89% |
SMR NuScale Power Corporation | -24.06% | -20.97% | 444.98% | -67.93% | 2.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGDV and SMR is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGDV vs. SMR — Risk / Return Rank
CGDV
SMR
CGDV vs. SMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) and NuScale Power Corporation (SMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CGDV | SMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 0.91 | +0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.84 | -0.83 | +3.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.37 | -1.22 | +14.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CGDV | SMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.34 | -0.66 | +3.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.21 | 0.02 | +1.19 |
Drawdowns
CGDV vs. SMR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGDV drawdown since its inception was -21.82%, smaller than the maximum SMR drawdown of -87.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGDV and SMR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGDV | SMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.82% | -87.47% | +65.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.75% | -82.86% | +73.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.28% | -82.86% | +68.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -87.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.22% | -79.86% | +77.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.61% | -34.97% | +31.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | 56.46% | -54.39% |
Volatility
CGDV vs. SMR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) is 3.60%, while NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) has a volatility of 29.21%. This indicates that CGDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGDV | SMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.60% | 29.21% | -25.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.47% | 69.12% | -59.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.85% | 104.37% | -92.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.51% | 93.41% | -77.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.51% | 89.34% | -73.83% |
Dividends
CGDV vs. SMR - Dividend Comparison
CGDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, while SMR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | 1.19% | 1.29% | 1.60% | 1.65% | 1.36% |
SMR NuScale Power Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGDV and SMR have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMR has higher volatility (29.21%) compared to CGDV (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGDV dropped -21.82% vs SMR's -87.47%.
CGDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CGDV and SMR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer