CGDV vs. FSENX

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

CGDV (Capital Group Dividend Value ETF) and FSENX (Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio) are both funds - CGDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group, while FSENX is a Energy Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 3 years, CGDV returned 24.27%/yr vs 18.77%/yr for FSENX. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CGDV charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for FSENX.

Performance

CGDV vs. FSENX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) and Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGDV achieves a 10.15% return, which is significantly lower than FSENX's 33.31% return.

CGDV

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 1.46%
• YTD: 10.15%
• 6M: 10.88%
• 1Y: 27.58%
• 3Y*: 24.27%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FSENX

• 1D: -2.51%
• 1M: 2.35%
• YTD: 33.31%
• 6M: 32.07%
• 1Y: 49.59%
• 3Y*: 18.77%
• 5Y*: 21.62%
• 10Y*: 8.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGDV vs. FSENX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF	10.15%	25.50%	20.10%	28.81%	-2.89%
FSENX Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio	33.31%	10.56%	4.26%	0.94%	34.43%

Correlation

The correlation between CGDV and FSENX is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022	0.43

Over the past year, the correlation between CGDV and FSENX has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.43, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

CGDV vs. FSENX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGDV

CGDV Risk / Return Rank: 76
CGDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
CGDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
CGDV Omega Ratio Rank: 81
CGDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
CGDV Martin Ratio Rank: 77

FSENX

FSENX Risk / Return Rank: 80
FSENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
FSENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
FSENX Omega Ratio Rank: 64
FSENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
FSENX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGDV vs. FSENX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) and Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CGDV	FSENX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.34	2.68	-0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.20	3.40	-0.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.43	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.84	5.31	-2.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.37	15.48	-2.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CGDV vs. FSENX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the FSENX Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGDV and FSENX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CGDV	FSENX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.34	2.68	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.80	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.29	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.21	0.32	+0.89

Drawdowns

CGDV vs. FSENX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGDV drawdown since its inception was -21.82%, smaller than the maximum FSENX drawdown of -76.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGDV and FSENX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGDV	FSENX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.82%	-76.24%	+54.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.75%	-9.95%	+0.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.28%	-25.85%	+11.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.02%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-72.11%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.22%	-6.29%	+4.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.61%	-17.01%	+13.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.07%	3.41%	-1.34%

Volatility

CGDV vs. FSENX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) is 3.60%, while Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX) has a volatility of 7.11%. This indicates that CGDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSENX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGDV	FSENX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.60%	7.11%	-3.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.47%	15.46%	-5.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.85%	19.72%	-7.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.51%	27.28%	-11.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.51%	30.95%	-15.44%

CGDV vs. FSENX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGDV has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than FSENX's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGDV vs. FSENX - Dividend Comparison

CGDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, less than FSENX's 1.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF	1.19%	1.29%	1.60%	1.65%	1.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FSENX Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio	1.61%	1.95%	1.95%	1.98%	2.50%	2.25%	3.43%	1.84%	1.48%	1.74%	0.62%	1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGDV and FSENX in my portfolio?

CGDV and FSENX have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CGDV or FSENX?

FSENX has higher volatility (7.11%) compared to CGDV (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGDV dropped -21.82% vs FSENX's -76.24%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSENX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.