CGDG vs. NVDA

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

CGDG (Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF) is Global Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group, while NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) is a stock. Over the past year, CGDG returned 14.02% vs 47.43% for NVDA. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CGDG vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGDG achieves a 4.06% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 12.01% return.

CGDG

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: -0.38%
• YTD: 4.06%
• 6M: 5.30%
• 1Y: 14.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NVDA

• 1D: 1.73%
• 1M: -2.94%
• YTD: 12.01%
• 6M: 12.58%
• 1Y: 47.43%
• 3Y*: 75.35%
• 5Y*: 64.54%
• 10Y*: 68.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGDG vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CGDG Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF	4.06%	22.74%	11.52%	10.17%
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	12.01%	38.92%	171.25%	16.62%

Correlation

The correlation between CGDG and NVDA is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2023	0.37

Return for Risk

CGDG vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGDG

CGDG Risk / Return Rank: 41
CGDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
CGDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
CGDG Omega Ratio Rank: 38
CGDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
CGDG Martin Ratio Rank: 47

NVDA

NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 77
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 73
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGDG vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CGDG	NVDA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.31	1.37	-0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.86	1.94	-0.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.24	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.82	2.36	-0.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.01	5.73	+1.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CGDG vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGDG Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGDG and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CGDG	NVDA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.31	1.37	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.25	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.38	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.49	0.63	+0.86

Drawdowns

CGDG vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGDG drawdown since its inception was -10.52%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGDG and NVDA.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGDG	NVDA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.52%	-89.72%	+79.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.72%	-20.21%	+12.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-36.88%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-66.34%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-66.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.28%	-11.39%	+9.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.32%	-36.20%	+34.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.00%	8.30%	-6.30%

Volatility

CGDG vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG) is 2.82%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 13.14%. This indicates that CGDG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGDG	NVDA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.82%	13.14%	-10.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.35%	26.37%	-18.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.73%	34.81%	-24.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.16%	51.75%	-39.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.16%	49.85%	-37.69%

Dividends

CGDG vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

CGDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, more than NVDA's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CGDG Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF	1.90%	1.95%	2.15%	0.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	0.14%	0.02%	0.03%	0.03%	0.11%	0.05%	0.12%	0.27%	0.46%	0.29%	0.45%	1.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGDG and NVDA in my portfolio?

CGDG and NVDA have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CGDG or NVDA?

NVDA has higher volatility (13.14%) compared to CGDG (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGDG dropped -10.52% vs NVDA's -89.72%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.