CEMR.DE vs. DBZB.DE
CEMR.DE (iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF) and DBZB.DE (Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged) are both exchange-traded funds - CEMR.DE is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI Europe Momentum Index, while DBZB.DE is a Global Bonds fund tracking the FTSE World Government Bond - Developed Markets (EUR Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CEMR.DE returned 11.36%/yr vs -0.99%/yr for DBZB.DE. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
CEMR.DE vs. DBZB.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEMR.DE achieves a 7.91% return, which is significantly higher than DBZB.DE's -0.71% return. Over the past 10 years, CEMR.DE has outperformed DBZB.DE with an annualized return of 11.36%, while DBZB.DE has yielded a comparatively lower -0.99% annualized return.
CEMR.DE
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 2.66%
- YTD
- 7.91%
- 6M
- 11.22%
- 1Y
- 16.74%
- 3Y*
- 20.23%
- 5Y*
- 11.35%
- 10Y*
- 11.36%
DBZB.DE
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- -0.71%
- 6M
- -0.56%
- 1Y
- 0.09%
- 3Y*
- 0.76%
- 5Y*
- -2.54%
- 10Y*
- -0.99%
CEMR.DE vs. DBZB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEMR.DE iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF | 7.91% | 27.17% | 20.01% | 12.79% | -15.33% | 22.25% | 10.74% | 31.66% | -10.73% | 11.48% |
DBZB.DE Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged | -0.71% | 1.28% | -0.41% | 3.56% | -15.11% | -3.19% | 4.16% | 4.55% | -0.36% | -0.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEMR.DE and DBZB.DE is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2015 | -0.03 |
The correlation between CEMR.DE and DBZB.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (all time) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEMR.DE vs. DBZB.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CEMR.DE
DBZB.DE
CEMR.DE vs. DBZB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (CEMR.DE) and Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (DBZB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEMR.DE | DBZB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.00 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.49 | -0.01 | +1.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.53 | -0.04 | +5.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEMR.DE | DBZB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01 | -0.01 | +1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | -0.47 | +1.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | -0.21 | +0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.22 | +0.39 |
Drawdowns
CEMR.DE vs. DBZB.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEMR.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.78%, which is greater than DBZB.DE's maximum drawdown of -21.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEMR.DE and DBZB.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEMR.DE | DBZB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.78% | -21.88% | -9.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.73% | -3.52% | -8.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.75% | -5.14% | -10.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.73% | -19.51% | -4.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.78% | -21.88% | -9.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.48% | -16.44% | +14.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.03% | -5.97% | -0.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.16% | 1.26% | +1.90% |
Volatility
CEMR.DE vs. DBZB.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (CEMR.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.42% compared to Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (DBZB.DE) at 1.48%. This indicates that CEMR.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBZB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEMR.DE | DBZB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.42% | 1.48% | +2.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.63% | 3.06% | +11.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.29% | 3.86% | +13.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.37% | 5.37% | +11.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.48% | 4.74% | +11.74% |
CEMR.DE vs. DBZB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CEMR.DE and DBZB.DE have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CEMR.DE vs. DBZB.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CEMR.DE nor DBZB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CEMR.DE and DBZB.DE have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CEMR.DE and DBZB.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
CEMR.DE is categorized as Momentum, while DBZB.DE is Global Bonds. CEMR.DE tracks MSCI Europe Momentum Index, while DBZB.DE tracks FTSE World Government Bond - Developed Markets (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers.
Find the right allocation for CEMR.DE and DBZB.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer