PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CEMF.DE vs. YCSH.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CEMF.DE vs. YCSH.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (CEMF.DE) and iShares € Cash UCITS ETF EUR Acc (YCSH.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEMF.DE achieves a -1.42% return, which is significantly lower than YCSH.DE's 0.84% return.


CEMF.DE

1D
0.28%
1M
-0.57%
YTD
-1.42%
6M
-1.29%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

YCSH.DE

1D
0.01%
1M
0.15%
YTD
0.84%
6M
0.99%
1Y
1.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEMF.DE vs. YCSH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CEMF.DE and YCSH.DE is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025

-0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CEMF.DE vs. YCSH.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEMF.DE

YCSH.DE
YCSH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
YCSH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCSH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCSH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
YCSH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCSH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEMF.DE vs. YCSH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (CEMF.DE) and iShares € Cash UCITS ETF EUR Acc (YCSH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CEMF.DE vs. YCSH.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CEMF.DEYCSH.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

11.33

-11.04

Drawdowns

CEMF.DE vs. YCSH.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEMF.DE drawdown since its inception was -4.45%, which is greater than YCSH.DE's maximum drawdown of -0.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEMF.DE and YCSH.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CEMF.DEYCSH.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.45%

-0.07%

-4.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.97%

0.00%

-2.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.20%

-0.00%

-1.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

Volatility

CEMF.DE vs. YCSH.DE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CEMF.DEYCSH.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.62%

0.11%

+4.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.62%

0.20%

+4.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.62%

0.20%

+4.42%

CEMF.DE vs. YCSH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CEMF.DE and YCSH.DE have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CEMF.DE vs. YCSH.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CEMF.DE nor YCSH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CEMF.DE and YCSH.DE have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CEMF.DE and YCSH.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.

CEMF.DE is categorized as Government Bonds, while YCSH.DE is Money Market.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CEMF.DE and YCSH.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer