CELH vs. CLS.TO
CELH (Celsius Holdings, Inc.) and CLS.TO (Celestica Inc.) are both stocks. CELH operates in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic (Consumer Defensive), while CLS.TO operates in Electronic Components (Technology). Over the past 10 years, CELH returned 42.06%/yr vs 43.13%/yr for CLS.TO. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CELH vs. CLS.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CELH is traded in USD, while CLS.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CLS.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CELH achieves a -38.78% return, which is significantly lower than CLS.TO's 30.20% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CELH having a 42.06% annualized return and CLS.TO not far ahead at 43.13%.
CELH
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -13.29%
- YTD
- -38.78%
- 6M
- -36.79%
- 1Y
- -31.03%
- 3Y*
- -15.49%
- 5Y*
- 2.92%
- 10Y*
- 42.06%
CLS.TO
- 1D
- 3.51%
- 1M
- 2.58%
- YTD
- 30.20%
- 6M
- 13.02%
- 1Y
- 218.72%
- 3Y*
- 209.37%
- 5Y*
- 114.69%
- 10Y*
- 43.13%
CELH vs. CLS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CELH Celsius Holdings, Inc. | -38.78% | 73.65% | -51.69% | 57.21% | 39.52% | 48.22% | 941.61% | 39.19% | -33.90% | 114.29% |
CLS.TO Celestica Inc. | 30.20% | 220.69% | 215.14% | 160.52% | 1.78% | 37.36% | -2.32% | -6.08% | -16.29% | -11.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between CELH and CLS.TO is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.19 |
Fundamentals
CELH:
$7.27B
CLS.TO:
CA$62.28B
CELH:
$0.61
CLS.TO:
CA$8.28
CELH:
45.73
CLS.TO:
64.97
CELH:
0.05
CLS.TO:
0.87
CELH:
2.29
CLS.TO:
4.52
CELH:
18.26
CLS.TO:
29.68
CELH:
$2.97B
CLS.TO:
CA$13.81B
CELH:
$1.47B
CLS.TO:
CA$1.60B
CELH:
$274.27M
CLS.TO:
CA$1.36B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CELH vs. CLS.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CELH
CLS.TO
CELH vs. CLS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) and Celestica Inc. (CLS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CELH | CLS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.40 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.54 | 7.45 | -7.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.06 | 18.87 | -19.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CELH | CLS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.55 | 3.07 | -3.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | 2.04 | -1.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 0.88 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.43 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
CELH vs. CLS.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CELH drawdown since its inception was -77.86%, roughly equal to the maximum CLS.TO drawdown of -80.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CELH and CLS.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CELH | CLS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.86% | -80.63% | +2.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.22% | -29.56% | -27.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -77.86% | -53.42% | -24.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.86% | -53.42% | -24.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.86% | -80.63% | +2.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.87% | -18.17% | -52.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.86% | -26.18% | -1.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.34% | 11.65% | +17.69% |
Volatility
CELH vs. CLS.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) is 18.92%, while Celestica Inc. (CLS.TO) has a volatility of 27.08%. This indicates that CELH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CELH | CLS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.92% | 27.08% | -8.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.51% | 55.16% | -17.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.59% | 71.89% | -15.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.66% | 56.76% | +8.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.94% | 49.36% | +19.58% |
Dividends
CELH vs. CLS.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither CELH nor CLS.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
CELH vs. CLS.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Celsius Holdings, Inc. and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CELH vs. CLS.TO - Profitability Comparison
CELH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celsius Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 378.07M and revenue of 782.62M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.3%.
CLS.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 437.20M and revenue of 4.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.
CELH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celsius Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 138.99M and revenue of 782.62M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.8%.
CLS.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 267.70M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.6%.
CELH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celsius Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 85.08M and revenue of 782.62M, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.
CLS.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 212.30M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CELH and CLS.TO have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CELH and CLS.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer