PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCO.TO vs. UCU.V
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CCO.TO vs. UCU.V - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Cameco Corporation (CCO.TO) and Ucore Rare Metals Inc (UCU.V). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCO.TO achieves a 16.89% return, which is significantly higher than UCU.V's -4.04% return. Over the past 10 years, CCO.TO has outperformed UCU.V with an annualized return of 26.75%, while UCU.V has yielded a comparatively lower 5.28% annualized return.


CCO.TO

1D
1.96%
1M
-8.17%
YTD
16.89%
6M
16.59%
1Y
77.90%
3Y*
53.26%
5Y*
41.88%
10Y*
26.75%

UCU.V

1D
-2.24%
1M
-2.97%
YTD
-4.04%
6M
-24.20%
1Y
296.21%
3Y*
67.15%
5Y*
34.92%
10Y*
5.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCO.TO vs. UCU.V - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CCO.TO
Cameco Corporation
16.89%70.37%29.62%86.52%11.71%62.18%48.65%-24.97%34.00%-14.67%
UCU.V
Ucore Rare Metals Inc
-4.04%626.67%-13.79%27.94%-6.85%-38.14%-47.56%162.96%-52.08%-22.58%

Correlation

The correlation between CCO.TO and UCU.V is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2006

0.09

Over the past year, CCO.TO and UCU.V have become more correlated (0.36) than their long-term average of 0.09, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CCO.TO:

CA$64.00B

UCU.V:

CA$595.19M

EPS

CCO.TO:

CA$1.49

UCU.V:

-CA$0.40

PB Ratio

CCO.TO:

9.06

UCU.V:

8.40

Total Revenue (TTM)

CCO.TO:

CA$3.54B

UCU.V:

CA$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

CCO.TO:

CA$1.13B

UCU.V:

-CA$1.84M

EBITDA (TTM)

CCO.TO:

CA$818.74M

UCU.V:

-CA$31.97M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCO.TO vs. UCU.V — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCO.TO
CCO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
CCO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
CCO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

UCU.V
UCU.V Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
UCU.V Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UCU.V Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
UCU.V Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
UCU.V Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
UCU.V Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCO.TO vs. UCU.V - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cameco Corporation (CCO.TO) and Ucore Rare Metals Inc (UCU.V). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CCO.TOUCU.VDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.35

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

5.06

-1.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.12

8.03

-0.91

CCO.TO vs. UCU.V - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCO.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the UCU.V Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCO.TO and UCU.V, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CCO.TOUCU.VDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

2.44

-1.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

0.40

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.06

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.01

+0.16

Drawdowns

CCO.TO vs. UCU.V - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCO.TO drawdown since its inception was -83.63%, smaller than the maximum UCU.V drawdown of -98.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCO.TO and UCU.V.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCO.TOUCU.VDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.63%

-98.60%

+14.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.86%

-59.01%

+34.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.52%

-59.01%

+19.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.52%

-65.81%

+26.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.84%

-83.62%

+30.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.13%

-60.73%

+41.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.39%

-80.87%

+32.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.98%

37.10%

-26.12%

Volatility

CCO.TO vs. UCU.V - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cameco Corporation (CCO.TO) is 15.64%, while Ucore Rare Metals Inc (UCU.V) has a volatility of 25.95%. This indicates that CCO.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UCU.V based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCO.TOUCU.VDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.64%

25.95%

-10.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.81%

69.56%

-31.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.65%

122.63%

-67.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.90%

87.21%

-39.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.04%

92.83%

-47.79%

Dividends

CCO.TO vs. UCU.V - Dividend Comparison

CCO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, while UCU.V has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCO.TO
Cameco Corporation
0.16%0.19%0.22%0.21%0.39%0.29%0.47%0.69%0.52%3.45%2.85%2.34%
UCU.V
Ucore Rare Metals Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

CCO.TO vs. UCU.V - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cameco Corporation and Ucore Rare Metals Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20222023202420252026
845.37M
0
(CCO.TO) Total Revenue
(UCU.V) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CCO.TO and UCU.V have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCO.TO and UCU.V

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer