CCLFX vs. CGBL

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

CCLFX (Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund) and CGBL (Capital Group Core Balanced ETF) are both funds - CCLFX is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by Cliffwater, while CGBL is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Capital Group. Over the past year, CCLFX returned 7.37% vs 16.11% for CGBL. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CCLFX charges 3.42%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CGBL.

Performance

CCLFX vs. CGBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund (CCLFX) and Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCLFX achieves a 2.33% return, which is significantly lower than CGBL's 5.41% return.

CCLFX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.38%
• YTD: 2.33%
• 6M: 2.84%
• 1Y: 7.37%
• 3Y*: 10.54%
• 5Y*: 8.75%
• 10Y*: —

CGBL

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: -0.56%
• YTD: 5.41%
• 6M: 6.40%
• 1Y: 16.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCLFX vs. CGBL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CCLFX Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund	2.33%	8.93%	12.62%	3.17%
CGBL Capital Group Core Balanced ETF	5.41%	15.33%	16.64%	9.80%

Correlation

The correlation between CCLFX and CGBL is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2023	0.10

Return for Risk

CCLFX vs. CGBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCLFX

CCLFX Risk / Return Rank: 100
CCLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
CCLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
CCLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 100
CCLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
CCLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 100

CGBL

CGBL Risk / Return Rank: 52
CGBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
CGBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
CGBL Omega Ratio Rank: 54
CGBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
CGBL Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCLFX vs. CGBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund (CCLFX) and Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CCLFX	CGBL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	8.60	1.64	+6.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	20.84	2.34	+18.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	7.79	1.30	+6.49
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	39.22	2.05	+37.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	218.79	9.04	+209.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CCLFX vs. CGBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCLFX Sharpe Ratio is 8.60, which is higher than the CGBL Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCLFX and CGBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CCLFX	CGBL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.60	1.64	+6.96
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	5.10	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	4.57	1.62	+2.95

Drawdowns

CCLFX vs. CGBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCLFX drawdown since its inception was -3.91%, smaller than the maximum CGBL drawdown of -11.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCLFX and CGBL.

Drawdown Indicators

	CCLFX	CGBL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.91%	-11.66%	+7.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.19%	-7.88%	+7.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.46%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-2.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.50%	+2.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.16%	-1.29%	+1.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.03%	1.79%	-1.76%

Volatility

CCLFX vs. CGBL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund (CCLFX) is 0.23%, while Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL) has a volatility of 3.53%. This indicates that CCLFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CCLFX	CGBL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.23%	3.53%	-3.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.65%	8.17%	-7.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87%	9.88%	-9.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.73%	11.09%	-9.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.87%	11.09%	-9.22%

CCLFX vs. CGBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCLFX has a 3.42% expense ratio, which is higher than CGBL's 0.33% expense ratio.

Dividends

CCLFX vs. CGBL - Dividend Comparison

CCLFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.28%, more than CGBL's 1.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CCLFX Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund	10.28%	10.47%	11.27%	10.96%	3.96%	7.03%	6.90%	0.61%
CGBL Capital Group Core Balanced ETF	1.89%	1.98%	1.92%	0.48%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CCLFX and CGBL in my portfolio?

CCLFX and CGBL have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CCLFX or CGBL?

CGBL has higher volatility (3.53%) compared to CCLFX (0.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCLFX dropped -3.91% vs CGBL's -11.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CCLFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.60 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.