PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCL vs. UBER
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CCL vs. UBER - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Carnival Corporation & Plc (CCL) and Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCL achieves a -10.61% return, which is significantly higher than UBER's -14.26% return.


CCL

1D
-1.46%
1M
3.02%
YTD
-10.61%
6M
4.96%
1Y
12.44%
3Y*
27.77%
5Y*
-2.16%
10Y*
-4.15%

UBER

1D
-0.92%
1M
-7.14%
YTD
-14.26%
6M
-24.32%
1Y
-18.15%
3Y*
19.56%
5Y*
7.35%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCL vs. UBER - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CCL
Carnival Corporation & Plc
-10.61%22.55%34.41%130.02%-59.94%-7.11%-56.89%-2.70%
UBER
Uber Technologies, Inc.
-14.26%35.46%-2.03%148.97%-41.02%-17.78%71.49%-29.19%

Correlation

The correlation between CCL and UBER is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2019

0.41

The correlation between CCL and UBER shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.46 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CCL:

$37.60B

UBER:

$145.12B

EPS

CCL:

$2.21

UBER:

$4.05

PE Ratio

CCL:

12.20

UBER:

17.28

PS Ratio

CCL:

1.40

UBER:

2.75

PB Ratio

CCL:

2.89

UBER:

5.86

Total Revenue (TTM)

CCL:

$26.98B

UBER:

$53.69B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CCL:

$10.13B

UBER:

$22.03B

EBITDA (TTM)

CCL:

$7.23B

UBER:

$5.85B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCL vs. UBER — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCL
CCL Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
CCL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCL Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
CCL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCL Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

UBER
UBER Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
UBER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBER Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBER Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
UBER Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBER Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCL vs. UBER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carnival Corporation & Plc (CCL) and Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CCLUBERDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

0.93

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.43

-0.59

+1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.87

-1.04

+1.91

CCL vs. UBER - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCL Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is higher than the UBER Sharpe Ratio of -0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCL and UBER, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CCLUBERDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

-0.56

+0.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

0.16

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.15

+0.02

Drawdowns

CCL vs. UBER - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCL drawdown since its inception was -90.37%, which is greater than UBER's maximum drawdown of -68.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCL and UBER.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCLUBERDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.37%

-68.05%

-22.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.30%

-30.89%

+1.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.85%

-30.89%

-11.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.68%

-60.45%

-18.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-90.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-58.77%

-30.01%

-28.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.57%

-25.67%

-2.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.38%

17.51%

-3.13%

Volatility

CCL vs. UBER - Volatility Comparison

Carnival Corporation & Plc (CCL) has a higher volatility of 13.45% compared to Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) at 7.84%. This indicates that CCL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UBER based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCLUBERDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.45%

7.84%

+5.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.65%

24.00%

+13.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.62%

32.64%

+13.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.40%

44.82%

+10.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.57%

50.67%

+6.90%

Dividends

CCL vs. UBER - Dividend Comparison

CCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, while UBER has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCL
Carnival Corporation & Plc
1.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.31%3.93%3.96%2.41%2.59%2.02%
UBER
Uber Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

CCL vs. UBER - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Carnival Corporation & Plc and Uber Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
6.17B
13.20B
(CCL) Total Revenue
(UBER) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CCL vs. UBER - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Carnival Corporation & Plc and Uber Technologies, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
36.1%
45.0%
Portfolio components
CCL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carnival Corporation & Plc reported a gross profit of 2.23B and revenue of 6.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.1%.

UBER - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Uber Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 5.95B and revenue of 13.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.0%.

CCL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carnival Corporation & Plc reported an operating income of 607.00M and revenue of 6.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.

UBER - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Uber Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.92B and revenue of 13.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.6%.

CCL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carnival Corporation & Plc reported a net income of 258.00M and revenue of 6.17B, resulting in a net margin of 4.2%.

UBER - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Uber Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 263.00M and revenue of 13.20B, resulting in a net margin of 2.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CCL and UBER have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CCL has higher volatility (13.45%) compared to UBER (7.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCL dropped -90.37% vs UBER's -68.05%.

CCL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.27 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCL and UBER

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer