CCL vs. MTTR
CCL (Carnival Corporation & Plc) and MTTR (Matterport, Inc.) are both stocks. CCL operates in Travel Services (Consumer Cyclical), while MTTR operates in Software - Application (Technology). At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CCL vs. MTTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CCL
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- 3.02%
- YTD
- -10.61%
- 6M
- 4.96%
- 1Y
- 12.44%
- 3Y*
- 27.77%
- 5Y*
- -2.16%
- 10Y*
- -4.15%
MTTR
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CCL vs. MTTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCL Carnival Corporation & Plc | -10.61% | 22.55% | 34.41% | 130.02% | -59.94% | 7.02% |
MTTR Matterport, Inc. | 0.00% | 13.50% | 76.21% | -3.93% | -86.43% | 93.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCL and MTTR is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2021 | 0.34 |
The correlation between CCL and MTTR shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (3 years) to 0.35 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CCL:
$26.98B
MTTR:
$169.70M
CCL:
$10.13B
MTTR:
$82.91M
CCL:
$7.23B
MTTR:
-$161.50M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCL vs. MTTR — Risk / Return Rank
CCL
MTTR
CCL vs. MTTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carnival Corporation & Plc (CCL) and Matterport, Inc. (MTTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CCL | MTTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.43 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.87 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CCL | MTTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | — | — |
Drawdowns
CCL vs. MTTR - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCL | MTTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.77% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.57% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.38% | — | — |
Volatility
CCL vs. MTTR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCL | MTTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.45% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.65% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.62% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.40% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.57% | — | — |
Dividends
CCL vs. MTTR - Dividend Comparison
CCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, while MTTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCL Carnival Corporation & Plc | 1.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.31% | 3.93% | 3.96% | 2.41% | 2.59% | 2.02% |
MTTR Matterport, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CCL vs. MTTR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Carnival Corporation & Plc and Matterport, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CCL and MTTR have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CCL and MTTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer