CCL vs. MTN
CCL (Carnival Corporation & Plc) and MTN (Vail Resorts, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — CCL in Travel Services, MTN in Resorts & Casinos. Over the past 10 years, CCL returned -4.15%/yr vs 2.68%/yr for MTN. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CCL vs. MTN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCL achieves a -10.61% return, which is significantly lower than MTN's 5.09% return. Over the past 10 years, CCL has underperformed MTN with an annualized return of -4.15%, while MTN has yielded a comparatively higher 2.68% annualized return.
CCL
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- 3.02%
- YTD
- -10.61%
- 6M
- 4.96%
- 1Y
- 12.44%
- 3Y*
- 27.77%
- 5Y*
- -2.16%
- 10Y*
- -4.15%
MTN
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- 9.40%
- YTD
- 5.09%
- 6M
- -1.45%
- 1Y
- -2.97%
- 3Y*
- -12.71%
- 5Y*
- -12.18%
- 10Y*
- 2.68%
CCL vs. MTN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCL Carnival Corporation & Plc | -10.61% | 22.55% | 34.41% | 130.02% | -59.94% | -7.11% | -56.89% | 7.37% | -23.40% | 30.76% |
MTN Vail Resorts, Inc. | 5.09% | -24.88% | -7.96% | -7.06% | -24.89% | 18.15% | 17.77% | 17.34% | 1.74% | 34.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCL and MTN is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 1997 | 0.35 |
The correlation between CCL and MTN shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.42 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CCL:
$2.21
MTN:
$5.62
CCL:
12.20
MTN:
24.41
CCL:
1.40
MTN:
1.31
CCL:
$26.98B
MTN:
$2.83B
CCL:
$10.13B
MTN:
$2.12B
CCL:
$7.23B
MTN:
$499.82M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCL vs. MTN — Risk / Return Rank
CCL
MTN
CCL vs. MTN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carnival Corporation & Plc (CCL) and Vail Resorts, Inc. (MTN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CCL | MTN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.01 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.43 | -0.11 | +0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.87 | -0.20 | +1.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CCL | MTN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 | -0.09 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 | -0.39 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.07 | 0.08 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.21 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
CCL vs. MTN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCL drawdown since its inception was -90.37%, which is greater than MTN's maximum drawdown of -77.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCL and MTN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCL | MTN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.37% | -77.54% | -12.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.30% | -26.40% | -2.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.85% | -45.73% | +2.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.68% | -61.17% | -17.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.37% | -61.17% | -29.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.77% | -55.24% | -3.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.57% | -26.12% | -2.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.38% | 14.74% | -0.36% |
Volatility
CCL vs. MTN - Volatility Comparison
Carnival Corporation & Plc (CCL) has a higher volatility of 13.45% compared to Vail Resorts, Inc. (MTN) at 6.59%. This indicates that CCL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MTN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCL | MTN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.45% | 6.59% | +6.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.65% | 26.27% | +11.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.62% | 33.65% | +12.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.40% | 31.70% | +23.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.57% | 32.29% | +25.28% |
Dividends
CCL vs. MTN - Dividend Comparison
CCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, less than MTN's 6.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCL Carnival Corporation & Plc | 1.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.31% | 3.93% | 3.96% | 2.41% | 2.59% | 2.02% |
MTN Vail Resorts, Inc. | 6.47% | 6.69% | 4.74% | 3.86% | 3.21% | 0.54% | 0.63% | 2.94% | 2.79% | 1.98% | 2.01% | 1.95% |
Financials
CCL vs. MTN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Carnival Corporation & Plc and Vail Resorts, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CCL vs. MTN - Profitability Comparison
CCL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carnival Corporation & Plc reported a gross profit of 2.23B and revenue of 6.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.1%.
MTN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vail Resorts, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.15B and revenue of 1.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.3%.
CCL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carnival Corporation & Plc reported an operating income of 607.00M and revenue of 6.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.
MTN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vail Resorts, Inc. reported an operating income of 494.13M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.0%.
CCL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carnival Corporation & Plc reported a net income of 258.00M and revenue of 6.17B, resulting in a net margin of 4.2%.
MTN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vail Resorts, Inc. reported a net income of 314.44M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in a net margin of 26.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CCL and MTN have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CCL has higher volatility (13.45%) compared to MTN (6.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCL dropped -90.37% vs MTN's -77.54%.
CCL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.27 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CCL and MTN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer