PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCH.L vs. WPP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CCH.L vs. WPP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Coca Cola HBC AG (CCH.L) and WPP plc (WPP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CCH.L is traded in GBp, while WPP is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the WPP values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCH.L achieves a 15.72% return, which is significantly higher than WPP's -19.30% return. Over the past 10 years, CCH.L has outperformed WPP with an annualized return of 15.43%, while WPP has yielded a comparatively lower -12.04% annualized return.


CCH.L

1D
1.02%
1M
4.62%
YTD
15.72%
6M
21.68%
1Y
14.12%
3Y*
26.11%
5Y*
14.25%
10Y*
15.43%

WPP

1D
-1.39%
1M
-3.33%
YTD
-19.30%
6M
-9.76%
1Y
-50.78%
3Y*
-29.18%
5Y*
-19.55%
10Y*
-12.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCH.L vs. WPP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CCH.L
Coca Cola HBC AG
15.72%43.91%22.14%20.08%-19.68%10.15%-4.69%11.09%3.27%39.03%
WPP
WPP plc
-19.30%-56.84%15.53%-3.58%-23.87%44.88%-19.67%31.33%-32.52%-22.33%

Correlation

The correlation between CCH.L and WPP is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2013

0.26

Over the past year, the correlation between CCH.L and WPP has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.26, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CCH.L:

£15.80B

WPP:

$3.75B

EPS

CCH.L:

£4.84

WPP:

$1.51

PE Ratio

CCH.L:

8.96

WPP:

11.58

PEG Ratio

CCH.L:

0.50

WPP:

0.15

PS Ratio

CCH.L:

0.71

WPP:

0.13

PB Ratio

CCH.L:

4.10

WPP:

1.48

Total Revenue (TTM)

CCH.L:

£22.35B

WPP:

$28.29B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CCH.L:

£8.14B

WPP:

$4.60B

EBITDA (TTM)

CCH.L:

£3.00B

WPP:

$2.22B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCH.L vs. WPP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCH.L
CCH.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
CCH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
CCH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

WPP
WPP Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
WPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
WPP Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
WPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
WPP Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCH.L vs. WPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Coca Cola HBC AG (CCH.L) and WPP plc (WPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CCH.LWPPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

0.79

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.78

-0.87

+1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.62

-1.22

+2.84

CCH.L vs. WPP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCH.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is higher than the WPP Sharpe Ratio of -1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCH.L and WPP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CCH.LWPPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

-1.08

+1.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

-0.60

+1.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

-0.36

+0.95

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

-0.05

+0.44

Drawdowns

CCH.L vs. WPP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCH.L drawdown since its inception was -48.45%, smaller than the maximum WPP drawdown of -81.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCH.L and WPP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCH.LWPPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.45%

-81.43%

+32.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.05%

-58.70%

+40.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.05%

-72.95%

+54.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.54%

-77.45%

+29.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.45%

-81.43%

+32.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.33%

-77.86%

+69.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.56%

-27.40%

+12.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.69%

41.59%

-32.90%

Volatility

CCH.L vs. WPP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Coca Cola HBC AG (CCH.L) is 5.39%, while WPP plc (WPP) has a volatility of 12.99%. This indicates that CCH.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WPP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCH.LWPPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.39%

12.99%

-7.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.58%

32.49%

-15.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.68%

47.43%

-24.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.86%

32.70%

-8.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.20%

33.26%

-7.06%

Dividends

CCH.L vs. WPP - Dividend Comparison

CCH.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, less than WPP's 5.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCH.L
Coca Cola HBC AG
2.39%2.33%2.96%2.94%3.60%2.50%2.35%6.99%1.95%1.60%1.88%1.76%
WPP
WPP plc
5.79%9.09%4.85%5.09%4.38%2.45%5.66%5.47%7.35%4.32%3.01%2.81%

Financials

CCH.L vs. WPP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Coca Cola HBC AG and WPP plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B8.00B20212022202320242025
5.98B
6.89B
(CCH.L) Total Revenue
(WPP) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. CCH.L values in GBp, WPP values in USD

CCH.L vs. WPP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Coca Cola HBC AG and WPP plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%20212022202320242025
36.8%
19.0%
Portfolio components
CCH.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coca Cola HBC AG reported a gross profit of 2.20B and revenue of 5.98B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.

WPP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, WPP plc reported a gross profit of 1.31B and revenue of 6.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.0%.

CCH.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coca Cola HBC AG reported an operating income of 654.01M and revenue of 5.98B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.9%.

WPP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, WPP plc reported an operating income of 161.00M and revenue of 6.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.3%.

CCH.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coca Cola HBC AG reported a net income of 469.16M and revenue of 5.98B, resulting in a net margin of 7.9%.

WPP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, WPP plc reported a net income of -259.00M and revenue of 6.89B, resulting in a net margin of -3.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CCH.L and WPP have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCH.L and WPP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer