PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCH.L vs. RIO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CCH.L vs. RIO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Coca Cola HBC AG (CCH.L) and Rio Tinto Group (RIO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CCH.L is traded in GBp, while RIO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the RIO values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCH.L achieves a 15.72% return, which is significantly lower than RIO's 30.63% return. Over the past 10 years, CCH.L has underperformed RIO with an annualized return of 15.43%, while RIO has yielded a comparatively higher 22.53% annualized return.


CCH.L

1D
1.02%
1M
4.62%
YTD
15.72%
6M
21.68%
1Y
14.12%
3Y*
26.11%
5Y*
14.25%
10Y*
15.43%

RIO

1D
0.00%
1M
-2.35%
YTD
30.63%
6M
41.56%
1Y
82.11%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
12.15%
10Y*
22.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCH.L vs. RIO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CCH.L
Coca Cola HBC AG
15.72%43.91%22.14%20.08%-19.68%10.15%-4.69%11.09%3.27%39.03%
RIO
Rio Tinto Group
30.90%34.17%-13.88%5.51%32.56%-2.76%32.22%28.11%2.83%32.35%

Correlation

The correlation between CCH.L and RIO is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2013

0.12

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CCH.L:

£15.80B

RIO:

$165.37B

EPS

CCH.L:

£4.84

RIO:

$13.11

PE Ratio

CCH.L:

8.96

RIO:

7.70

PS Ratio

CCH.L:

0.71

RIO:

1.48

PB Ratio

CCH.L:

4.10

RIO:

2.66

Total Revenue (TTM)

CCH.L:

£22.35B

RIO:

$111.41B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CCH.L:

£8.14B

RIO:

$31.10B

EBITDA (TTM)

CCH.L:

£3.00B

RIO:

$40.42B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCH.L vs. RIO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCH.L
CCH.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
CCH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
CCH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

RIO
RIO Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
RIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIO Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
RIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCH.L vs. RIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Coca Cola HBC AG (CCH.L) and Rio Tinto Group (RIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CCH.LRIODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.48

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.78

5.97

-5.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.62

24.05

-22.43

CCH.L vs. RIO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCH.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is lower than the RIO Sharpe Ratio of 3.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCH.L and RIO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CCH.LRIODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

3.11

-2.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.46

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.79

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.25

+0.14

Drawdowns

CCH.L vs. RIO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCH.L drawdown since its inception was -48.45%, smaller than the maximum RIO drawdown of -85.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCH.L and RIO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCH.LRIODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.45%

-85.30%

+36.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.05%

-13.82%

-4.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.05%

-24.61%

+6.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.54%

-27.80%

-19.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.45%

-33.21%

-15.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.33%

-8.97%

+0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.56%

-25.08%

+10.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.69%

3.42%

+5.27%

Volatility

CCH.L vs. RIO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Coca Cola HBC AG (CCH.L) is 5.39%, while Rio Tinto Group (RIO) has a volatility of 10.53%. This indicates that CCH.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCH.LRIODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.39%

10.53%

-5.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.58%

21.75%

-5.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.68%

26.56%

-3.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.86%

26.41%

-2.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.20%

28.76%

-2.56%

Dividends

CCH.L vs. RIO - Dividend Comparison

CCH.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, less than RIO's 3.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCH.L
Coca Cola HBC AG
2.39%2.33%2.96%2.94%3.60%2.50%2.35%6.99%1.95%1.60%1.88%1.76%
RIO
Rio Tinto Group
3.98%4.66%7.40%5.40%10.48%10.23%5.13%7.68%6.32%4.47%3.93%7.58%

Financials

CCH.L vs. RIO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Coca Cola HBC AG and Rio Tinto Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B20212022202320242025
5.98B
30.65B
(CCH.L) Total Revenue
(RIO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. CCH.L values in GBp, RIO values in USD

CCH.L vs. RIO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Coca Cola HBC AG and Rio Tinto Group over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%20212022202320242025
36.8%
26.6%
Portfolio components
CCH.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coca Cola HBC AG reported a gross profit of 2.20B and revenue of 5.98B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.

RIO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported a gross profit of 8.15B and revenue of 30.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.6%.

CCH.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coca Cola HBC AG reported an operating income of 654.01M and revenue of 5.98B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.9%.

RIO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported an operating income of 8.15B and revenue of 30.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.

CCH.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coca Cola HBC AG reported a net income of 469.16M and revenue of 5.98B, resulting in a net margin of 7.9%.

RIO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported a net income of 5.42B and revenue of 30.65B, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CCH.L and RIO have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCH.L and RIO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer