CCH.L vs. BAG.L
CCH.L (Coca Cola HBC AG) and BAG.L (A.G.Barr plc) are both stocks. Both operate in the Beverages - Non-Alcoholic industry within the Consumer Defensive sector. Over the past 10 years, CCH.L returned 15.43%/yr vs 3.88%/yr for BAG.L. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CCH.L vs. BAG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCH.L achieves a 15.72% return, which is significantly higher than BAG.L's 0.99% return. Over the past 10 years, CCH.L has outperformed BAG.L with an annualized return of 15.43%, while BAG.L has yielded a comparatively lower 3.88% annualized return.
CCH.L
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- 4.62%
- YTD
- 15.72%
- 6M
- 21.68%
- 1Y
- 14.12%
- 3Y*
- 26.11%
- 5Y*
- 14.25%
- 10Y*
- 15.43%
BAG.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- YTD
- 0.99%
- 6M
- 0.67%
- 1Y
- -8.06%
- 3Y*
- 10.29%
- 5Y*
- 6.06%
- 10Y*
- 3.88%
CCH.L vs. BAG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCH.L Coca Cola HBC AG | 15.72% | 43.91% | 22.14% | 20.08% | -19.68% | 10.15% | -4.69% | 11.09% | 3.27% | 39.03% |
BAG.L A.G.Barr plc | 0.99% | 5.05% | 21.87% | -1.23% | 5.31% | 1.72% | -10.52% | -24.80% | 21.06% | 35.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCH.L and BAG.L is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2013 | 0.20 |
The correlation between CCH.L and BAG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.33 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CCH.L:
£15.80B
BAG.L:
£688.86M
CCH.L:
£4.84
BAG.L:
£0.77
CCH.L:
8.96
BAG.L:
7.94
CCH.L:
0.50
BAG.L:
0.56
CCH.L:
0.71
BAG.L:
0.80
CCH.L:
4.10
BAG.L:
2.04
CCH.L:
£22.35B
BAG.L:
£857.70M
CCH.L:
£8.14B
BAG.L:
£340.30M
CCH.L:
£3.00B
BAG.L:
£139.50M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCH.L vs. BAG.L — Risk / Return Rank
CCH.L
BAG.L
CCH.L vs. BAG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Coca Cola HBC AG (CCH.L) and A.G.Barr plc (BAG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CCH.L | BAG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 0.94 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.78 | -0.60 | +1.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.62 | -1.08 | +2.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CCH.L | BAG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | -0.44 | +1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.27 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.14 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.18 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
CCH.L vs. BAG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCH.L drawdown since its inception was -48.45%, smaller than the maximum BAG.L drawdown of -93.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCH.L and BAG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCH.L | BAG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.45% | -93.03% | +44.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.05% | -13.45% | -4.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.05% | -16.05% | -2.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.54% | -24.81% | -22.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.45% | -61.52% | +13.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.33% | -26.68% | +18.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.56% | -21.35% | +6.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.69% | 7.47% | +1.22% |
Volatility
CCH.L vs. BAG.L - Volatility Comparison
Coca Cola HBC AG (CCH.L) has a higher volatility of 5.39% compared to A.G.Barr plc (BAG.L) at 5.07%. This indicates that CCH.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCH.L | BAG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.39% | 5.07% | +0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.58% | 14.75% | +1.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.68% | 18.49% | +4.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.86% | 22.62% | +1.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.20% | 27.07% | -0.87% |
Dividends
CCH.L vs. BAG.L - Dividend Comparison
CCH.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, less than BAG.L's 3.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAG.L A.G.Barr plc | 3.04% | 2.76% | 2.55% | 2.58% | 2.35% | 1.93% | 0.00% | 2.89% | 1.99% | 2.19% | 2.69% | 2.32% |
CCH.L Coca Cola HBC AG | 2.39% | 2.33% | 2.96% | 2.94% | 3.60% | 2.50% | 2.35% | 6.99% | 1.95% | 1.60% | 1.88% | 1.76% |
Financials
CCH.L vs. BAG.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Coca Cola HBC AG and A.G.Barr plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CCH.L vs. BAG.L - Profitability Comparison
CCH.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coca Cola HBC AG reported a gross profit of 2.20B and revenue of 5.98B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
BAG.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, A.G.Barr plc reported a gross profit of 80.90M and revenue of 209.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.7%.
CCH.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coca Cola HBC AG reported an operating income of 654.01M and revenue of 5.98B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.9%.
BAG.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, A.G.Barr plc reported an operating income of 27.40M and revenue of 209.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.1%.
CCH.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coca Cola HBC AG reported a net income of 469.16M and revenue of 5.98B, resulting in a net margin of 7.9%.
BAG.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, A.G.Barr plc reported a net income of 19.40M and revenue of 209.20M, resulting in a net margin of 9.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CCH.L and BAG.L have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CCH.L and BAG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer