CB vs. WULF
CB (Chubb Limited) and WULF (TeraWulf Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — CB in Insurance - Property & Casualty, WULF in Capital Markets. Over the past 10 years, CB returned 11.89%/yr vs 10.67%/yr for WULF. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CB vs. WULF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CB achieves a 3.43% return, which is significantly lower than WULF's 125.07% return. Over the past 10 years, CB has outperformed WULF with an annualized return of 11.89%, while WULF has yielded a comparatively lower 10.67% annualized return.
CB
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- 3.43%
- 6M
- 8.96%
- 1Y
- 10.97%
- 3Y*
- 20.64%
- 5Y*
- 15.72%
- 10Y*
- 11.89%
WULF
- 1D
- 7.75%
- 1M
- 10.56%
- YTD
- 125.07%
- 6M
- 72.86%
- 1Y
- 494.48%
- 3Y*
- 168.90%
- 5Y*
- 22.83%
- 10Y*
- 10.67%
CB vs. WULF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CB Chubb Limited | 3.43% | 14.46% | 23.89% | 4.20% | 15.97% | 27.85% | 1.41% | 22.94% | -9.63% | 12.82% |
WULF TeraWulf Inc. | 125.07% | 103.00% | 135.83% | 260.58% | -95.58% | 77.08% | 86.34% | -36.55% | 12.13% | -33.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between CB and WULF is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 1996 | 0.03 |
The correlation between CB and WULF shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CB:
$127.01B
WULF:
$10.94B
CB:
$28.35
WULF:
-$2.55
CB:
2.67
WULF:
61.90
CB:
$48.15B
WULF:
$168.06M
CB:
$17.01B
WULF:
$107.59M
CB:
$12.22B
WULF:
-$132.10M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CB vs. WULF — Risk / Return Rank
CB
WULF
CB vs. WULF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chubb Limited (CB) and TeraWulf Inc. (WULF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CB | WULF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.51 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.18 | 15.71 | -14.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.70 | 41.48 | -38.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CB | WULF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | 4.72 | -4.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.18 | +0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.11 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.11 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
CB vs. WULF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CB drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, smaller than the maximum WULF drawdown of -98.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CB and WULF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CB | WULF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.99% | -98.50% | +47.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -31.74% | +22.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.35% | -75.77% | +61.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.26% | -98.50% | +79.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.59% | -98.50% | +55.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.81% | -28.31% | +22.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.68% | -46.67% | +35.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.52% | 12.00% | -7.48% |
Volatility
CB vs. WULF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Chubb Limited (CB) is 6.11%, while TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) has a volatility of 21.75%. This indicates that CB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WULF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CB | WULF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.11% | 21.75% | -15.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.14% | 64.60% | -51.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.69% | 105.83% | -88.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.34% | 127.48% | -107.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.69% | 101.40% | -77.71% |
Dividends
CB vs. WULF - Dividend Comparison
CB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, while WULF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CB Chubb Limited | 1.21% | 1.22% | 1.30% | 1.51% | 1.49% | 1.65% | 2.01% | 1.91% | 2.24% | 1.93% | 2.07% | 4.23% |
WULF TeraWulf Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 33.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CB vs. WULF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chubb Limited and TeraWulf Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CB and WULF have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WULF has higher volatility (21.75%) compared to CB (6.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CB dropped -50.99% vs WULF's -98.50%.
WULF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.72 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CB and WULF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer