CB vs. RGTI
CB (Chubb Limited) and RGTI (Rigetti Computing Inc) are both stocks. CB operates in Insurance - Property & Casualty (Financial Services), while RGTI operates in Computer Hardware (Technology). Over the past 5 years, CB returned 15.72%/yr vs 17.30%/yr for RGTI. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CB vs. RGTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CB achieves a 3.43% return, which is significantly higher than RGTI's -1.74% return.
CB
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- 3.43%
- 6M
- 8.96%
- 1Y
- 10.97%
- 3Y*
- 20.64%
- 5Y*
- 15.72%
- 10Y*
- 11.89%
RGTI
- 1D
- 5.25%
- 1M
- 14.92%
- YTD
- -1.74%
- 6M
- -22.98%
- 1Y
- 92.95%
- 3Y*
- 153.88%
- 5Y*
- 17.30%
- 10Y*
- —
CB vs. RGTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CB Chubb Limited | 3.43% | 14.46% | 23.89% | 4.20% | 15.97% | 18.68% |
RGTI Rigetti Computing Inc | -1.74% | 45.15% | 1,449.40% | 35.07% | -92.91% | 3.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between CB and RGTI is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2021 | 0.01 |
The correlation between CB and RGTI shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CB:
$127.01B
RGTI:
$7.30B
CB:
$28.35
RGTI:
-$0.71
CB:
2.67
RGTI:
689.11
CB:
1.59
RGTI:
12.51
CB:
$48.15B
RGTI:
$10.02M
CB:
$17.01B
RGTI:
$3.00M
CB:
$12.22B
RGTI:
-$263.06M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CB vs. RGTI — Risk / Return Rank
CB
RGTI
CB vs. RGTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chubb Limited (CB) and Rigetti Computing Inc (RGTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CB | RGTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.21 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.18 | 1.21 | -0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.70 | 1.89 | +0.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CB | RGTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | 0.86 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.13 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.13 | +0.27 |
Drawdowns
CB vs. RGTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CB drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, smaller than the maximum RGTI drawdown of -96.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CB and RGTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CB | RGTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.99% | -96.89% | +45.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -77.10% | +67.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.35% | -78.83% | +64.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.26% | -96.89% | +77.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.81% | -61.37% | +55.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.68% | -58.86% | +48.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.52% | 49.35% | -44.83% |
Volatility
CB vs. RGTI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Chubb Limited (CB) is 6.11%, while Rigetti Computing Inc (RGTI) has a volatility of 44.71%. This indicates that CB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RGTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CB | RGTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.11% | 44.71% | -38.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.14% | 70.87% | -57.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.69% | 109.36% | -91.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.34% | 128.92% | -108.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.69% | 127.31% | -103.62% |
Dividends
CB vs. RGTI - Dividend Comparison
CB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, while RGTI has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CB Chubb Limited | 1.21% | 1.22% | 1.30% | 1.51% | 1.49% | 1.65% | 2.01% | 1.91% | 2.24% | 1.93% | 2.07% | 4.23% |
RGTI Rigetti Computing Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CB vs. RGTI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chubb Limited and Rigetti Computing Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CB and RGTI have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RGTI has higher volatility (44.71%) compared to CB (6.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CB dropped -50.99% vs RGTI's -96.89%.
RGTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CB and RGTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer