CB vs. QBTS
CB (Chubb Limited) and QBTS (D-Wave Quantum Inc) are both stocks. CB operates in Insurance - Property & Casualty (Financial Services), while QBTS operates in Computer Hardware (Technology). Over the past 3 years, CB returned 20.64%/yr vs 125.25%/yr for QBTS. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
CB vs. QBTS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CB achieves a 3.43% return, which is significantly higher than QBTS's -1.22% return.
CB
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- 3.43%
- 6M
- 8.96%
- 1Y
- 10.97%
- 3Y*
- 20.64%
- 5Y*
- 15.72%
- 10Y*
- 11.89%
QBTS
- 1D
- 8.30%
- 1M
- 14.44%
- YTD
- -1.22%
- 6M
- -9.18%
- 1Y
- 38.72%
- 3Y*
- 125.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CB vs. QBTS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CB Chubb Limited | 3.43% | 14.46% | 23.89% | 4.20% | 20.01% |
QBTS D-Wave Quantum Inc | -1.22% | 211.31% | 854.44% | -38.88% | -83.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between CB and QBTS is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2022 | -0.06 |
Fundamentals
CB:
$127.01B
QBTS:
$9.49B
CB:
$28.35
QBTS:
-$1.08
CB:
2.67
QBTS:
704.19
CB:
1.59
QBTS:
8.44
CB:
$48.15B
QBTS:
$12.44M
CB:
$17.01B
QBTS:
$8.25M
CB:
$12.22B
QBTS:
-$399.03M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CB vs. QBTS — Risk / Return Rank
CB
QBTS
CB vs. QBTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chubb Limited (CB) and D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CB | QBTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.15 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.18 | 0.55 | +0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.70 | 0.96 | +1.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CB | QBTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | 0.36 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.19 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
CB vs. QBTS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CB drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, smaller than the maximum QBTS drawdown of -96.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CB and QBTS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CB | QBTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.99% | -96.67% | +45.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -71.01% | +61.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.35% | -79.17% | +64.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.81% | -42.32% | +36.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.68% | -65.80% | +55.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.52% | 40.50% | -35.98% |
Volatility
CB vs. QBTS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Chubb Limited (CB) is 6.11%, while D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS) has a volatility of 42.76%. This indicates that CB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QBTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CB | QBTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.11% | 42.76% | -36.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.14% | 76.88% | -63.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.69% | 108.49% | -90.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.34% | 151.19% | -130.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.69% | 151.19% | -127.50% |
Dividends
CB vs. QBTS - Dividend Comparison
CB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, while QBTS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CB Chubb Limited | 1.21% | 1.22% | 1.30% | 1.51% | 1.49% | 1.65% | 2.01% | 1.91% | 2.24% | 1.93% | 2.07% | 4.23% |
QBTS D-Wave Quantum Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CB vs. QBTS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chubb Limited and D-Wave Quantum Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CB and QBTS have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QBTS has higher volatility (42.76%) compared to CB (6.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CB dropped -50.99% vs QBTS's -96.67%.
CB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.62 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CB and QBTS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer