CB vs. ASML

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

CB (Chubb Limited) and ASML (ASML Holding N.V.) are both stocks. CB operates in Insurance - Property & Casualty (Financial Services), while ASML operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology). Over the past 10 years, CB returned 11.89%/yr vs 34.75%/yr for ASML. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CB vs. ASML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chubb Limited (CB) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CB achieves a 3.43% return, which is significantly lower than ASML's 64.06% return. Over the past 10 years, CB has underperformed ASML with an annualized return of 11.89%, while ASML has yielded a comparatively higher 34.75% annualized return.

CB

• 1D: -1.35%
• 1M: 0.70%
• YTD: 3.43%
• 6M: 8.96%
• 1Y: 10.97%
• 3Y*: 20.64%
• 5Y*: 15.72%
• 10Y*: 11.89%

ASML

• 1D: 6.54%
• 1M: 9.86%
• YTD: 64.06%
• 6M: 56.76%
• 1Y: 134.10%
• 3Y*: 36.05%
• 5Y*: 21.93%
• 10Y*: 34.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CB vs. ASML - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CB Chubb Limited	3.43%	14.46%	23.89%	4.20%	15.97%	27.85%	1.41%	22.94%	-9.63%	12.82%
ASML ASML Holding N.V.	64.06%	56.51%	-7.70%	39.91%	-30.49%	64.13%	66.06%	93.56%	-9.80%	56.23%

Correlation

The correlation between CB and ASML is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.07
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 1995	0.26

The correlation between CB and ASML shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap CB : $127.01B ASML : $674.60B
EPS CB : $28.35 ASML : $25.86
PE Ratio CB : 11.35 ASML : 67.64
PEG Ratio CB : 0.79 ASML : 4.45
PS Ratio CB : 2.67 ASML : 20.10
PB Ratio CB : 1.59 ASML : 32.39
Total Revenue (TTM) CB : $48.15B ASML : $33.69B
Gross Profit (TTM) CB : $17.01B ASML : $17.72B
EBITDA (TTM) CB : $12.22B ASML : $12.99B

Return for Risk

CB vs. ASML — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CB

CB Risk / Return Rank: 61
CB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
CB Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
CB Omega Ratio Rank: 54
CB Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
CB Martin Ratio Rank: 66

ASML

ASML Risk / Return Rank: 95
ASML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
ASML Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
ASML Omega Ratio Rank: 92
ASML Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
ASML Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CB vs. ASML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chubb Limited (CB) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CB	ASML	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.62	3.24	-2.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.03	3.63	-2.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.45	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.18	7.56	-6.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.70	20.33	-17.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CB vs. ASML - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CB Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is lower than the ASML Sharpe Ratio of 3.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CB and ASML, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CB	ASML	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62	3.24	-2.61
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78	0.52	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50	0.90	-0.40
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	0.56	-0.16

Drawdowns

CB vs. ASML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CB drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, smaller than the maximum ASML drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CB and ASML.

Drawdown Indicators

	CB	ASML	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.99%	-90.00%	+39.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.36%	-17.85%	+8.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.35%	-45.38%	+31.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.26%	-56.84%	+37.58%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.59%	-56.84%	+14.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.81%	-0.48%	-5.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.68%	-28.14%	+17.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.52%	6.62%	-2.10%

Volatility

CB vs. ASML - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Chubb Limited (CB) is 6.11%, while ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) has a volatility of 15.94%. This indicates that CB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CB	ASML	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.11%	15.94%	-9.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.14%	33.30%	-20.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.69%	41.73%	-24.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.34%	42.23%	-21.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.69%	38.62%	-14.93%

Dividends

CB vs. ASML - Dividend Comparison

CB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, more than ASML's 0.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASML ASML Holding N.V.	0.50%	0.97%	0.97%	0.86%	1.27%	0.50%	0.50%	1.40%	0.94%	0.64%	0.92%	0.73%
CB Chubb Limited	1.21%	1.22%	1.30%	1.51%	1.49%	1.65%	2.01%	1.91%	2.24%	1.93%	2.07%	4.23%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CB and ASML in my portfolio?

CB and ASML have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CB or ASML?

ASML has higher volatility (15.94%) compared to CB (6.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CB dropped -50.99% vs ASML's -90.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ASML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.