CAT vs. HLT
CAT (Caterpillar Inc.) and HLT (Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.) are both stocks. CAT operates in Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery (Industrials), while HLT operates in Lodging (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, CAT returned 31.20%/yr vs 48.67%/yr for HLT. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CAT vs. HLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAT achieves a 60.51% return, which is significantly higher than HLT's 18.69% return. Over the past 10 years, CAT has underperformed HLT with an annualized return of 31.20%, while HLT has yielded a comparatively higher 48.67% annualized return.
CAT
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- 2.03%
- YTD
- 60.51%
- 6M
- 54.15%
- 1Y
- 161.94%
- 3Y*
- 59.74%
- 5Y*
- 33.67%
- 10Y*
- 31.20%
HLT
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 7.58%
- YTD
- 18.69%
- 6M
- 26.36%
- 1Y
- 35.01%
- 3Y*
- 34.37%
- 5Y*
- 22.25%
- 10Y*
- 48.67%
CAT vs. HLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAT Caterpillar Inc. | 60.51% | 60.30% | 24.66% | 25.95% | 18.60% | 15.95% | 26.97% | 19.51% | -17.56% | 75.03% |
HLT Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. | 18.69% | 16.49% | 36.11% | 44.68% | -18.72% | 40.20% | 0.47% | 55.48% | -9.40% | 829.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAT and HLT is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2013 | 0.45 |
The correlation between CAT and HLT shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.46 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CAT:
$426.51B
HLT:
$79.03B
CAT:
$20.07
HLT:
$6.50
CAT:
45.62
HLT:
52.41
CAT:
3.02
HLT:
0.85
CAT:
6.07
HLT:
6.58
CAT:
$70.76B
HLT:
$12.28B
CAT:
$23.01B
HLT:
$5.44B
CAT:
$15.31B
HLT:
$3.00B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAT vs. HLT — Risk / Return Rank
CAT
HLT
CAT vs. HLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CAT | HLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.69 | 1.27 | +0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 11.74 | 3.42 | +8.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 38.95 | 7.93 | +31.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CAT | HLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.76 | 1.52 | +3.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.10 | 0.83 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.01 | 0.27 | +0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.23 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
CAT vs. HLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAT drawdown since its inception was -73.43%, which is greater than HLT's maximum drawdown of -50.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAT and HLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAT | HLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.43% | -50.82% | -22.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.88% | -10.29% | -3.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.05% | -26.35% | -7.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.05% | -32.65% | -1.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.36% | -50.82% | +7.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.64% | -0.72% | -1.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.74% | -9.73% | -10.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.18% | 4.43% | -0.25% |
Volatility
CAT vs. HLT - Volatility Comparison
Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) has a higher volatility of 10.77% compared to Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT) at 6.93%. This indicates that CAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAT | HLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.77% | 6.93% | +3.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.35% | 17.33% | +10.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.31% | 23.12% | +11.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.67% | 27.07% | +3.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.89% | 181.03% | -150.14% |
Dividends
CAT vs. HLT - Dividend Comparison
CAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, more than HLT's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAT Caterpillar Inc. | 0.66% | 1.02% | 1.49% | 1.69% | 1.93% | 2.07% | 2.26% | 2.56% | 2.58% | 1.97% | 3.32% | 4.33% |
HLT Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. | 0.18% | 0.21% | 0.24% | 0.33% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.54% | 0.84% | 31.40% | 1.03% | 0.65% |
Financials
CAT vs. HLT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Caterpillar Inc. and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CAT vs. HLT - Profitability Comparison
CAT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Caterpillar Inc. reported a gross profit of 6.11B and revenue of 17.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.1%.
HLT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.18B and revenue of 2.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.3%.
CAT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Caterpillar Inc. reported an operating income of 3.09B and revenue of 17.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.7%.
HLT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 678.00M and revenue of 2.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.1%.
CAT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Caterpillar Inc. reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 17.42B, resulting in a net margin of 14.6%.
HLT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 385.00M and revenue of 2.94B, resulting in a net margin of 13.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CAT and HLT have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CAT has higher volatility (10.77%) compared to HLT (6.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAT dropped -73.43% vs HLT's -50.82%.
CAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.76 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CAT and HLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer