PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CARR vs. FBIN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CARR vs. FBIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Carrier Global Corporation (CARR) and Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. (FBIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CARR achieves a 28.46% return, which is significantly higher than FBIN's -20.14% return.


CARR

1D
0.28%
1M
0.78%
YTD
28.46%
6M
28.00%
1Y
-3.50%
3Y*
15.82%
5Y*
9.42%
10Y*

FBIN

1D
1.05%
1M
4.67%
YTD
-20.14%
6M
-19.43%
1Y
-21.18%
3Y*
-14.22%
5Y*
-13.00%
10Y*
-0.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CARR vs. FBIN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CARR
Carrier Global Corporation
28.46%-21.57%20.26%41.47%-22.68%45.31%176.86%
FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations Inc.
-20.14%-25.41%-9.12%35.25%-36.48%26.02%124.98%

Correlation

The correlation between CARR and FBIN is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2020

0.59

The correlation between CARR and FBIN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

EPS

CARR:

$1.55

FBIN:

$2.15

PE Ratio

CARR:

43.59

FBIN:

18.36

PS Ratio

CARR:

2.63

FBIN:

1.07

Total Revenue (TTM)

CARR:

$21.87B

FBIN:

$3.36B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CARR:

$5.43B

FBIN:

$1.53B

EBITDA (TTM)

CARR:

$3.15B

FBIN:

$484.60M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CARR vs. FBIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CARR
CARR Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
CARR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CARR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
CARR Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
CARR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
CARR Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

FBIN
FBIN Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
FBIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBIN Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
FBIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBIN Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CARR vs. FBIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carrier Global Corporation (CARR) and Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. (FBIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CARRFBINDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

0.94

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.09

-0.44

+0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.15

-0.95

+0.80

CARR vs. FBIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CARR Sharpe Ratio is -0.10, which is higher than the FBIN Sharpe Ratio of -0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CARR and FBIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CARRFBINDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

-0.50

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

-0.36

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.31

+0.49

Drawdowns

CARR vs. FBIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CARR drawdown since its inception was -40.82%, smaller than the maximum FBIN drawdown of -62.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARR and FBIN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CARRFBINDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.82%

-62.42%

+21.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.38%

-47.93%

+10.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.91%

-61.90%

+23.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.82%

-61.90%

+21.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.31%

-55.26%

+38.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.22%

-16.69%

+2.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.04%

22.40%

+1.64%

Volatility

CARR vs. FBIN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Carrier Global Corporation (CARR) is 9.42%, while Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. (FBIN) has a volatility of 11.51%. This indicates that CARR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CARRFBINDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.42%

11.51%

-2.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.73%

35.66%

-8.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.51%

42.72%

-8.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.73%

36.50%

-4.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.49%

35.05%

-1.56%

Dividends

CARR vs. FBIN - Dividend Comparison

CARR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, less than FBIN's 2.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CARR
Carrier Global Corporation
1.71%1.70%1.16%1.30%1.54%0.94%0.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations Inc.
2.58%2.00%1.40%1.21%1.68%0.97%1.12%1.35%2.11%1.05%1.20%1.01%

Financials

CARR vs. FBIN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Carrier Global Corporation and Fortune Brands Innovations Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
5.34B
-66.20M
(CARR) Total Revenue
(FBIN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CARR vs. FBIN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Carrier Global Corporation and Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
23.3%
0
Portfolio components
CARR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carrier Global Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.24B and revenue of 5.34B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.3%.

FBIN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of -66.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

CARR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carrier Global Corporation reported an operating income of 259.00M and revenue of 5.34B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.

FBIN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. reported an operating income of -61.40M and revenue of -66.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 92.8%.

CARR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carrier Global Corporation reported a net income of 238.00M and revenue of 5.34B, resulting in a net margin of 4.5%.

FBIN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. reported a net income of -52.20M and revenue of -66.20M, resulting in a net margin of 78.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CARR and FBIN have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBIN has higher volatility (11.51%) compared to CARR (9.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CARR dropped -40.82% vs FBIN's -62.42%.

CARR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.10 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CARR and FBIN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer