CAOS vs. HFEQ
CAOS (Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF) and HFEQ (Unlimited HFEQ Equity Long/Short ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CAOS is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Alpha Architect, while HFEQ is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Unlimited. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.35, they often move in opposite directions. CAOS charges 0.63%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for HFEQ.
Performance
CAOS vs. HFEQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAOS achieves a 0.81% return, which is significantly lower than HFEQ's 9.98% return.
CAOS
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 0.81%
- 6M
- 0.65%
- 1Y
- 1.88%
- 3Y*
- 4.15%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HFEQ
- 1D
- -3.97%
- 1M
- -2.31%
- YTD
- 9.98%
- 6M
- 9.64%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CAOS vs. HFEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF | 0.81% | 1.17% |
HFEQ Unlimited HFEQ Equity Long/Short ETF | 9.98% | 14.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAOS and HFEQ is -0.35, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025 | -0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAOS vs. HFEQ — Risk / Return Rank
CAOS
HFEQ
CAOS vs. HFEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS) and Unlimited HFEQ Equity Long/Short ETF (HFEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CAOS | HFEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.17 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CAOS | HFEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.21 | 1.37 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
CAOS vs. HFEQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAOS drawdown since its inception was -3.60%, smaller than the maximum HFEQ drawdown of -12.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAOS and HFEQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAOS | HFEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.60% | -12.46% | +8.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.08% | -3.97% | +2.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.90% | -2.45% | +1.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.31% | — | — |
Volatility
CAOS vs. HFEQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAOS | HFEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.29% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.04% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.53% | 21.94% | -20.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.25% | 21.94% | -17.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.25% | 21.94% | -17.69% |
CAOS vs. HFEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
CAOS has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than HFEQ's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
CAOS vs. HFEQ - Dividend Comparison
Neither CAOS nor HFEQ has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HFEQ Unlimited HFEQ Equity Long/Short ETF | 9.59% | 10.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CAOS and HFEQ have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CAOS is cheaper at 0.63% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CAOS is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for HFEQ.
HFEQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.59%, compared with 0.00% for CAOS.
CAOS is categorized as Options Trading, while HFEQ is Long-Short. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Unlimited. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for CAOS and 1.00% for HFEQ.
Find the right allocation for CAOS and HFEQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer