CANY.TO vs. ZEQT.TO
CANY.TO (Evolve Canadian Equity UltraYield ETF) and ZEQT.TO (BMO All-Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CANY.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Evolve, while ZEQT.TO is a Global Equities fund actively managed by BMO. Both are actively managed. CANY.TO charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for ZEQT.TO.
Performance
CANY.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CANY.TO
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZEQT.TO
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 1.48%
- YTD
- 11.17%
- 6M
- 11.47%
- 1Y
- 30.22%
- 3Y*
- 25.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CANY.TO vs. ZEQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CANY.TO
ZEQT.TO
CANY.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve Canadian Equity UltraYield ETF (CANY.TO) and BMO All-Equity ETF (ZEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CANY.TO | ZEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 1.42 | — |
Drawdowns
CANY.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CANY.TO | ZEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -15.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -2.79% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -2.59% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.08% | — |
Volatility
CANY.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CANY.TO | ZEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.55% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.72% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 13.07% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 13.49% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 13.49% | — |
CANY.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CANY.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than ZEQT.TO's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
CANY.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison
CANY.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZEQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CANY.TO Evolve Canadian Equity UltraYield ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZEQT.TO BMO All-Equity ETF | 1.95% | 2.89% | 5.08% | 6.40% | 7.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, ZEQT.TO is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZEQT.TO is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for CANY.TO.
CANY.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while ZEQT.TO is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Evolve and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for CANY.TO and 0.18% for ZEQT.TO.
Find the right allocation for CANY.TO and ZEQT.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer