CAH vs. SMSN.L
CAH (Cardinal Health, Inc.) and SMSN.L (Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd) are both stocks. CAH operates in Medical Distribution (Healthcare), while SMSN.L operates in Consumer Electronics (Technology). Over the past 10 years, CAH returned 13.19%/yr vs 27.10%/yr for SMSN.L. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CAH vs. SMSN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAH achieves a -0.01% return, which is significantly lower than SMSN.L's 149.32% return. Over the past 10 years, CAH has underperformed SMSN.L with an annualized return of 13.19%, while SMSN.L has yielded a comparatively higher 27.10% annualized return.
CAH
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 11.34%
- YTD
- -0.01%
- 6M
- 3.32%
- 1Y
- 33.66%
- 3Y*
- 35.29%
- 5Y*
- 31.41%
- 10Y*
- 13.19%
SMSN.L
- 1D
- 1.28%
- 1M
- 5.20%
- YTD
- 149.32%
- 6M
- 179.18%
- 1Y
- 379.61%
- 3Y*
- 57.37%
- 5Y*
- 25.51%
- 10Y*
- 27.10%
CAH vs. SMSN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAH Cardinal Health, Inc. | -0.01% | 76.25% | 19.01% | 34.15% | 54.08% | -0.40% | 10.09% | 18.04% | -24.50% | -12.65% |
SMSN.L Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd | 149.32% | 130.81% | -37.94% | 38.34% | -31.32% | -8.01% | 60.01% | 41.56% | -25.35% | 62.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAH and SMSN.L is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2006 | 0.10 |
The correlation between CAH and SMSN.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.11 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CAH:
$48.26B
SMSN.L:
$1.39T
CAH:
$6.55
SMSN.L:
$320.04K
CAH:
31.22
SMSN.L:
0.02
CAH:
0.74
SMSN.L:
0.00
CAH:
0.19
SMSN.L:
0.00
CAH:
$250.55B
SMSN.L:
$389.99T
CAH:
$9.23B
SMSN.L:
$152.35T
CAH:
$2.79B
SMSN.L:
$68.67T
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAH vs. SMSN.L — Risk / Return Rank
CAH
SMSN.L
CAH vs. SMSN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH) and Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd (SMSN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CAH | SMSN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.74 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 17.15 | -15.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.37 | 56.85 | -52.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CAH | SMSN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | 7.44 | -6.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.25 | 0.74 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.82 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.53 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
CAH vs. SMSN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAH drawdown since its inception was -61.93%, which is greater than SMSN.L's maximum drawdown of -55.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAH and SMSN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAH | SMSN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.93% | -55.59% | -6.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.42% | -21.96% | +1.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.42% | -44.52% | +24.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.80% | -49.12% | +26.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.13% | -54.44% | +8.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.83% | -12.96% | +2.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.94% | -17.36% | +1.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.72% | 6.62% | +1.10% |
Volatility
CAH vs. SMSN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH) is 6.59%, while Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd (SMSN.L) has a volatility of 23.24%. This indicates that CAH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMSN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAH | SMSN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.59% | 23.24% | -16.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.73% | 43.27% | -23.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.99% | 50.70% | -20.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.19% | 34.66% | -9.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.23% | 32.88% | -3.65% |
Dividends
CAH vs. SMSN.L - Dividend Comparison
CAH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, more than SMSN.L's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAH Cardinal Health, Inc. | 1.00% | 0.99% | 1.28% | 1.98% | 2.57% | 3.80% | 3.62% | 3.80% | 4.24% | 3.00% | 2.41% | 1.68% |
SMSN.L Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd | 0.37% | 0.94% | 2.88% | 1.79% | 2.50% | 1.85% | 3.60% | 2.47% | 3.65% | 1.62% | 1.68% | 1.71% |
Financials
CAH vs. SMSN.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cardinal Health, Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CAH vs. SMSN.L - Profitability Comparison
CAH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cardinal Health, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.50B and revenue of 60.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 4.1%.
SMSN.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd reported a gross profit of 81.91T and revenue of 133.87T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.2%.
CAH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cardinal Health, Inc. reported an operating income of 509.00M and revenue of 60.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.8%.
SMSN.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd reported an operating income of 58.98T and revenue of 133.87T, resulting in an operating margin of 44.1%.
CAH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cardinal Health, Inc. reported a net income of 399.00M and revenue of 60.94B, resulting in a net margin of 0.7%.
SMSN.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd reported a net income of 48.66T and revenue of 133.87T, resulting in a net margin of 36.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CAH and SMSN.L have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CAH and SMSN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer