CACX.L vs. HG=F
CACX.L (Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) is Europe Equities fund tracking the Euronext Paris CAC 40 NR EUR, while HG=F (Copper) is an asset. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
CACX.L vs. HG=F - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CACX.L is traded in GBp, while HG=F is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HG=F values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
CACX.L
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 2.38%
- YTD
- 2.38%
- 6M
- 2.87%
- 1Y
- 11.26%
- 3Y*
- 7.92%
- 5Y*
- 7.66%
- 10Y*
- 11.41%
HG=F
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CACX.L vs. HG=F - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CACX.L Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 2.38% | 19.60% | -4.39% | 16.83% | 2.94% |
HG=F Copper | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between CACX.L and HG=F is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2022 | -0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CACX.L vs. HG=F — Risk / Return Rank
CACX.L
HG=F
CACX.L vs. HG=F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (CACX.L) and Copper (HG=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CACX.L | HG=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.95 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.88 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CACX.L | HG=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | — | — |
Drawdowns
CACX.L vs. HG=F - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CACX.L | HG=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.75% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.48% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.90% | — | — |
Volatility
CACX.L vs. HG=F - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CACX.L | HG=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.34% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.18% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.52% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.71% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.67% | — | — |
Frequently Asked Questions
CACX.L and HG=F have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CACX.L and HG=F
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer