CACX.L vs. ^RTSI
CACX.L (Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) is Europe Equities fund tracking the Euronext Paris CAC 40 NR EUR, while ^RTSI (RTS Index) is an index. Over the past 10 years, CACX.L returned 11.41%/yr vs 2.97%/yr for ^RTSI. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CACX.L vs. ^RTSI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CACX.L is traded in GBp, while ^RTSI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ^RTSI values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CACX.L achieves a 2.38% return, which is significantly higher than ^RTSI's 0.74% return. Over the past 10 years, CACX.L has outperformed ^RTSI with an annualized return of 11.41%, while ^RTSI has yielded a comparatively lower 2.97% annualized return.
CACX.L
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 2.38%
- YTD
- 2.38%
- 6M
- 2.87%
- 1Y
- 11.26%
- 3Y*
- 7.92%
- 5Y*
- 7.66%
- 10Y*
- 11.41%
^RTSI
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- 3.14%
- YTD
- 0.74%
- 6M
- 0.67%
- 1Y
- 1.68%
- 3Y*
- -0.44%
- 5Y*
- -6.45%
- 10Y*
- 2.97%
CACX.L vs. ^RTSI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CACX.L Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 2.38% | 19.60% | -4.39% | 16.83% | -0.56% | 22.14% | 0.79% | 26.03% | -5.19% | 19.33% |
^RTSI RTS Index | 0.74% | 16.24% | -16.37% | 6.05% | -32.11% | 16.05% | -13.79% | 40.70% | -1.72% | -8.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between CACX.L and ^RTSI is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008 | 0.34 |
The correlation between CACX.L and ^RTSI shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CACX.L vs. ^RTSI — Risk / Return Rank
CACX.L
^RTSI
CACX.L vs. ^RTSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (CACX.L) and RTS Index (^RTSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CACX.L | ^RTSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.01 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.95 | -0.03 | +0.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.88 | -0.07 | +2.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CACX.L | ^RTSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | -0.02 | +0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | -0.18 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.10 | +0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | -0.02 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
CACX.L vs. ^RTSI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CACX.L drawdown since its inception was -54.68%, smaller than the maximum ^RTSI drawdown of -72.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CACX.L and ^RTSI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CACX.L | ^RTSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.68% | -72.96% | +18.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.81% | -15.58% | +3.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.77% | -40.06% | +25.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.36% | -60.16% | +40.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.83% | -60.16% | +27.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.75% | -40.23% | +36.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.48% | -32.83% | +13.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.90% | 7.26% | -3.36% |
Volatility
CACX.L vs. ^RTSI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (CACX.L) is 3.34%, while RTS Index (^RTSI) has a volatility of 6.09%. This indicates that CACX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^RTSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CACX.L | ^RTSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.34% | 6.09% | -2.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.18% | 13.50% | -2.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.52% | 21.22% | -6.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.71% | 35.49% | -18.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.67% | 30.69% | -13.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CACX.L and ^RTSI have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CACX.L and ^RTSI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer