PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CACX.L vs. ^RTSI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CACX.L vs. ^RTSI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (CACX.L) and RTS Index (^RTSI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CACX.L is traded in GBp, while ^RTSI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ^RTSI values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CACX.L achieves a 2.38% return, which is significantly higher than ^RTSI's 0.74% return. Over the past 10 years, CACX.L has outperformed ^RTSI with an annualized return of 11.41%, while ^RTSI has yielded a comparatively lower 2.97% annualized return.


CACX.L

1D
0.06%
1M
2.38%
YTD
2.38%
6M
2.87%
1Y
11.26%
3Y*
7.92%
5Y*
7.66%
10Y*
11.41%

^RTSI

1D
-1.35%
1M
3.14%
YTD
0.74%
6M
0.67%
1Y
1.68%
3Y*
-0.44%
5Y*
-6.45%
10Y*
2.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CACX.L vs. ^RTSI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CACX.L
Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
2.38%19.60%-4.39%16.83%-0.56%22.14%0.79%26.03%-5.19%19.33%
^RTSI
RTS Index
0.74%16.24%-16.37%6.05%-32.11%16.05%-13.79%40.70%-1.72%-8.48%

Correlation

The correlation between CACX.L and ^RTSI is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008

0.34

The correlation between CACX.L and ^RTSI shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CACX.L vs. ^RTSI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CACX.L
CACX.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
CACX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CACX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
CACX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
CACX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
CACX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

^RTSI
^RTSI Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
^RTSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^RTSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
^RTSI Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
^RTSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
^RTSI Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CACX.L vs. ^RTSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (CACX.L) and RTS Index (^RTSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CACX.L^RTSIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.01

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.95

-0.03

+0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.88

-0.07

+2.95

CACX.L vs. ^RTSI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CACX.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is higher than the ^RTSI Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CACX.L and ^RTSI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CACX.L^RTSIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

-0.02

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

-0.18

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.10

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

-0.02

+0.18

Drawdowns

CACX.L vs. ^RTSI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CACX.L drawdown since its inception was -54.68%, smaller than the maximum ^RTSI drawdown of -72.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CACX.L and ^RTSI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CACX.L^RTSIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.68%

-72.96%

+18.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.81%

-15.58%

+3.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.77%

-40.06%

+25.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.36%

-60.16%

+40.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.83%

-60.16%

+27.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.75%

-40.23%

+36.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.48%

-32.83%

+13.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.90%

7.26%

-3.36%

Volatility

CACX.L vs. ^RTSI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (CACX.L) is 3.34%, while RTS Index (^RTSI) has a volatility of 6.09%. This indicates that CACX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^RTSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CACX.L^RTSIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.34%

6.09%

-2.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.18%

13.50%

-2.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.52%

21.22%

-6.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.71%

35.49%

-18.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.67%

30.69%

-13.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


CACX.L and ^RTSI have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CACX.L and ^RTSI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer