C vs. VT

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

C (Citigroup Inc.) is a stock, while VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) is Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. Over the past 10 years, C returned 15.14%/yr vs 12.61%/yr for VT. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

C vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Citigroup Inc. (C) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, C achieves a 15.36% return, which is significantly higher than VT's 9.77% return. Over the past 10 years, C has outperformed VT with an annualized return of 15.14%, while VT has yielded a comparatively lower 12.61% annualized return.

C

• 1D: 0.61%
• 1M: 6.16%
• YTD: 15.36%
• 6M: 23.58%
• 1Y: 74.17%
• 3Y*: 44.93%
• 5Y*: 15.19%
• 10Y*: 15.14%

VT

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: -0.45%
• YTD: 9.77%
• 6M: 10.59%
• 1Y: 25.47%
• 3Y*: 19.82%
• 5Y*: 10.54%
• 10Y*: 12.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

C vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
C Citigroup Inc.	15.36%	70.38%	41.93%	18.98%	-22.09%	0.93%	-19.70%	57.82%	-28.49%	27.03%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	9.77%	22.43%	16.49%	22.02%	-18.00%	18.27%	16.59%	26.81%	-9.76%	24.50%

Correlation

The correlation between C and VT is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2008	0.64

The correlation between C and VT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

C vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

C

C Risk / Return Rank: 92
C Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
C Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
C Omega Ratio Rank: 90
C Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
C Martin Ratio Rank: 93

VT

VT Risk / Return Rank: 65
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 66
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

C vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Citigroup Inc. (C) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	C	VT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.65	1.96	+0.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.30	2.68	+0.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.36	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.05	2.64	+2.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.54	11.68	+2.87
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

C vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current C Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is higher than the VT Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of C and VT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	C	VT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.65	1.96	+0.69
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52	0.66	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46	0.73	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.15	0.43	-0.28

Drawdowns

C vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum C drawdown since its inception was -98.00%, which is greater than VT's maximum drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for C and VT.

Drawdown Indicators

	C	VT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.00%	-50.27%	-47.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.76%	-9.67%	-5.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.31%	-16.51%	-14.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.78%	-26.38%	-19.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-56.51%	-34.24%	-22.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-64.43%	-3.06%	-61.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.51%	-7.02%	-36.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.12%	2.19%	+2.93%

Volatility

C vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

Citigroup Inc. (C) has a higher volatility of 8.43% compared to Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) at 4.55%. This indicates that C's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	C	VT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.43%	4.55%	+3.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.84%	10.67%	+12.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.19%	13.10%	+15.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.18%	16.10%	+13.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.23%	17.26%	+15.97%

Dividends

C vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

C's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, more than VT's 1.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
C Citigroup Inc.	1.80%	1.99%	3.10%	4.04%	4.51%	3.38%	3.31%	2.40%	2.96%	1.29%	0.71%	0.31%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	1.63%	1.82%	1.95%	2.08%	2.20%	1.82%	1.66%	2.32%	2.53%	2.11%	2.39%	2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both C and VT in my portfolio?

C and VT have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, C or VT?

C has higher volatility (8.43%) compared to VT (4.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, C dropped -98.00% vs VT's -50.27%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

C currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.