C vs. TSLY
C (Citigroup Inc.) is a stock, while TSLY (YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) is Options Trading fund actively managed by YieldMax. Over the past 3 years, C returned 44.93%/yr vs 11.84%/yr for TSLY. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
C vs. TSLY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, C achieves a 15.36% return, which is significantly higher than TSLY's -4.80% return.
C
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 6.16%
- YTD
- 15.36%
- 6M
- 23.58%
- 1Y
- 74.17%
- 3Y*
- 44.93%
- 5Y*
- 15.19%
- 10Y*
- 15.14%
TSLY
- 1D
- 4.18%
- 1M
- -3.87%
- YTD
- -4.80%
- 6M
- -2.72%
- 1Y
- 38.89%
- 3Y*
- 11.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
C vs. TSLY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C Citigroup Inc. | 15.36% | 70.38% | 41.93% | 18.98% | -8.31% |
TSLY YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | -4.80% | 13.62% | 27.83% | 50.69% | -27.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between C and TSLY is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2022 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
C vs. TSLY — Risk / Return Rank
C
TSLY
C vs. TSLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Citigroup Inc. (C) and YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| C | TSLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.19 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.05 | 1.81 | +3.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.54 | 4.37 | +10.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| C | TSLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.65 | 1.09 | +1.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.28 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
C vs. TSLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum C drawdown since its inception was -98.00%, which is greater than TSLY's maximum drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for C and TSLY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| C | TSLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.00% | -49.52% | -48.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.76% | -21.64% | +6.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.31% | -49.52% | +18.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.43% | -10.98% | -53.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.51% | -19.97% | -23.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.12% | 8.93% | -3.81% |
Volatility
C vs. TSLY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Citigroup Inc. (C) is 8.43%, while YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY) has a volatility of 12.39%. This indicates that C experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| C | TSLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.43% | 12.39% | -3.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.84% | 23.46% | -0.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.19% | 35.88% | -7.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.18% | 45.60% | -16.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.23% | 45.60% | -12.37% |
Dividends
C vs. TSLY - Dividend Comparison
C's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, less than TSLY's 88.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C Citigroup Inc. | 1.80% | 1.99% | 3.10% | 4.04% | 4.51% | 3.38% | 3.31% | 2.40% | 2.96% | 1.29% | 0.71% | 0.31% |
TSLY YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 88.79% | 91.19% | 82.30% | 76.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
C and TSLY have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLY has higher volatility (12.39%) compared to C (8.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, C dropped -98.00% vs TSLY's -49.52%.
C currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for C and TSLY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer