BXSL vs. SRLN

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

BXSL (Blackstone Secured Lending Fund) is a stock, while SRLN (State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF) is Bank Loan fund actively managed by State Street. Over the past 3 years, BXSL returned 7.34%/yr vs 7.64%/yr for SRLN. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

BXSL vs. SRLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL) and State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BXSL achieves a -8.16% return, which is significantly lower than SRLN's 0.63% return.

BXSL

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: -3.23%
• YTD: -8.16%
• 6M: -11.97%
• 1Y: -17.83%
• 3Y*: 7.34%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SRLN

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: -0.04%
• YTD: 0.63%
• 6M: 1.06%
• 1Y: 5.41%
• 3Y*: 7.64%
• 5Y*: 4.55%
• 10Y*: 4.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BXSL vs. SRLN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BXSL Blackstone Secured Lending Fund	-8.16%	-9.36%	29.02%	37.82%	-26.03%	32.04%
SRLN State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF	0.63%	6.77%	8.43%	11.62%	-5.30%	0.60%

Correlation

The correlation between BXSL and SRLN is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2021	0.35

Return for Risk

BXSL vs. SRLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BXSL

BXSL Risk / Return Rank: 11
BXSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
BXSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
BXSL Omega Ratio Rank: 11
BXSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
BXSL Martin Ratio Rank: 17

SRLN

SRLN Risk / Return Rank: 58
SRLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
SRLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
SRLN Omega Ratio Rank: 80
SRLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
SRLN Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BXSL vs. SRLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL) and State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BXSL	SRLN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.89	1.88	-2.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.25	2.74	-4.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.87	1.43	-0.56
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.76	1.67	-2.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.15	6.17	-7.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BXSL vs. SRLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BXSL Sharpe Ratio is -0.89, which is lower than the SRLN Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BXSL and SRLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BXSL	SRLN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.89	1.88	-2.78
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.17	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.75	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	0.70	-0.40

Drawdowns

BXSL vs. SRLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BXSL drawdown since its inception was -36.80%, which is greater than SRLN's maximum drawdown of -22.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BXSL and SRLN.

Drawdown Indicators

	BXSL	SRLN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.80%	-22.29%	-14.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.47%	-3.26%	-20.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.21%	-4.26%	-19.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-7.93%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-22.29%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.04%	-0.17%	-21.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.14%	-1.10%	-13.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.54%	0.88%	+14.66%

Volatility

BXSL vs. SRLN - Volatility Comparison

Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL) has a higher volatility of 5.43% compared to State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN) at 0.46%. This indicates that BXSL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SRLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BXSL	SRLN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.43%	0.46%	+4.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.25%	2.64%	+13.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.09%	2.89%	+17.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.73%	3.91%	+19.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.73%	6.06%	+17.67%

Dividends

BXSL vs. SRLN - Dividend Comparison

BXSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.16%, more than SRLN's 7.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BXSL Blackstone Secured Lending Fund	13.16%	11.70%	9.53%	10.64%	13.02%	1.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SRLN State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF	7.50%	7.67%	8.58%	8.44%	5.72%	4.45%	4.91%	5.39%	4.98%	4.01%	3.94%	4.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BXSL and SRLN in my portfolio?

BXSL and SRLN have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BXSL or SRLN?

BXSL has higher volatility (5.43%) compared to SRLN (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BXSL dropped -36.80% vs SRLN's -22.29%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SRLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.