BXSL vs. BIL
BXSL (Blackstone Secured Lending Fund) is a stock, while BIL (SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) is Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. Over the past 3 years, BXSL returned 7.34%/yr vs 4.62%/yr for BIL. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
BXSL vs. BIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BXSL achieves a -8.16% return, which is significantly lower than BIL's 1.54% return.
BXSL
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -3.23%
- YTD
- -8.16%
- 6M
- -11.97%
- 1Y
- -17.83%
- 3Y*
- 7.34%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BIL
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.54%
- 6M
- 1.78%
- 1Y
- 3.88%
- 3Y*
- 4.62%
- 5Y*
- 3.42%
- 10Y*
- 2.19%
BXSL vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BXSL Blackstone Secured Lending Fund | -8.16% | -9.36% | 29.02% | 37.82% | -26.03% | 32.04% |
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 1.54% | 4.15% | 5.19% | 4.94% | 1.40% | -0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between BXSL and BIL is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2021 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BXSL vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank
BXSL
BIL
BXSL vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BXSL | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -20.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -175.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 88.16 | -87.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | 356.40 | -357.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.15 | 2,826.06 | -2,827.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BXSL | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.89 | 19.64 | -20.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 13.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 8.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 2.78 | -2.48 |
Drawdowns
BXSL vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BXSL drawdown since its inception was -36.80%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BXSL and BIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BXSL | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.80% | -0.78% | -36.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.47% | -0.01% | -23.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.21% | -0.01% | -24.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.09% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -0.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.04% | 0.00% | -22.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.14% | -0.26% | -13.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.54% | 0.00% | +15.54% |
Volatility
BXSL vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL) has a higher volatility of 5.43% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.06%. This indicates that BXSL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BXSL | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.43% | 0.06% | +5.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.25% | 0.14% | +16.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.09% | 0.20% | +19.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.73% | 0.26% | +23.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.73% | 0.26% | +23.47% |
Dividends
BXSL vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison
BXSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.16%, more than BIL's 3.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 3.86% | 4.13% | 5.03% | 4.92% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.30% | 2.05% | 1.66% | 0.68% | 0.07% |
BXSL Blackstone Secured Lending Fund | 13.16% | 11.70% | 9.53% | 10.64% | 13.02% | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BXSL and BIL have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BXSL has higher volatility (5.43%) compared to BIL (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BXSL dropped -36.80% vs BIL's -0.78%.
BIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.64 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BXSL and BIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer