PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BWXT vs. QUBT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BWXT vs. QUBT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT) and Quantum Computing, Inc. (QUBT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BWXT achieves a 8.75% return, which is significantly higher than QUBT's 1.85% return.


BWXT

1D
0.81%
1M
-8.58%
YTD
8.75%
6M
5.16%
1Y
45.32%
3Y*
43.65%
5Y*
25.34%
10Y*
19.48%

QUBT

1D
4.97%
1M
8.85%
YTD
1.85%
6M
-19.68%
1Y
-23.72%
3Y*
90.15%
5Y*
9.20%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BWXT vs. QUBT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BWXT
BWX Technologies, Inc.
8.75%56.37%46.53%33.87%23.30%-19.40%-1.54%64.48%-41.51%
QUBT
Quantum Computing, Inc.
1.85%-38.01%1,712.51%-39.53%-55.72%-75.83%370.33%0.00%-42.31%

Correlation

The correlation between BWXT and QUBT is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2018

0.16

Over the past year, BWXT and QUBT have become more correlated (0.38) than their long-term average of 0.16, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BWXT:

$17.23B

QUBT:

$2.34B

EPS

BWXT:

$3.75

QUBT:

-$0.21

PS Ratio

BWXT:

5.10

QUBT:

451.06

PB Ratio

BWXT:

13.46

QUBT:

1.47

Total Revenue (TTM)

BWXT:

$3.38B

QUBT:

$4.33M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BWXT:

$566.27M

QUBT:

-$667.00K

EBITDA (TTM)

BWXT:

$534.48M

QUBT:

-$52.52M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BWXT vs. QUBT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BWXT
BWXT Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
BWXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BWXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
BWXT Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
BWXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
BWXT Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

QUBT
QUBT Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
QUBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUBT Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
QUBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUBT Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BWXT vs. QUBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT) and Quantum Computing, Inc. (QUBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BWXTQUBTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.04

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

-0.32

+2.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.59

-0.49

+5.09

BWXT vs. QUBT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BWXT Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is higher than the QUBT Sharpe Ratio of -0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BWXT and QUBT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BWXTQUBTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

-0.22

+1.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.07

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.06

+0.55

Drawdowns

BWXT vs. QUBT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BWXT drawdown since its inception was -47.88%, smaller than the maximum QUBT drawdown of -97.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BWXT and QUBT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BWXTQUBTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.88%

-97.53%

+49.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.42%

-74.37%

+51.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.87%

-82.40%

+49.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.92%

-95.63%

+62.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.27%

-59.31%

+38.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.17%

-72.96%

+59.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.89%

48.08%

-38.19%

Volatility

BWXT vs. QUBT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT) is 9.26%, while Quantum Computing, Inc. (QUBT) has a volatility of 36.37%. This indicates that BWXT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QUBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BWXTQUBTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.26%

36.37%

-27.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.52%

67.03%

-33.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.79%

106.87%

-62.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.91%

133.10%

-100.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.77%

177.68%

-146.91%

Dividends

BWXT vs. QUBT - Dividend Comparison

BWXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, while QUBT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BWXT
BWX Technologies, Inc.
0.55%0.58%0.86%1.20%1.52%1.75%1.26%1.10%1.67%0.69%0.91%30.37%
QUBT
Quantum Computing, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

BWXT vs. QUBT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BWX Technologies, Inc. and Quantum Computing, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
860.22M
3.69M
(BWXT) Total Revenue
(QUBT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


BWXT and QUBT have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QUBT has higher volatility (36.37%) compared to BWXT (9.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BWXT dropped -47.88% vs QUBT's -97.53%.

BWXT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BWXT and QUBT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer