BWXT vs. ASML
BWXT (BWX Technologies, Inc.) and ASML (ASML Holding N.V.) are both stocks. BWXT operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while ASML operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology). Over the past 10 years, BWXT returned 19.48%/yr vs 34.75%/yr for ASML. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BWXT vs. ASML - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BWXT achieves a 8.75% return, which is significantly lower than ASML's 64.06% return. Over the past 10 years, BWXT has underperformed ASML with an annualized return of 19.48%, while ASML has yielded a comparatively higher 34.75% annualized return.
BWXT
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- -8.58%
- YTD
- 8.75%
- 6M
- 5.16%
- 1Y
- 45.32%
- 3Y*
- 43.65%
- 5Y*
- 25.34%
- 10Y*
- 19.48%
ASML
- 1D
- 6.54%
- 1M
- 9.86%
- YTD
- 64.06%
- 6M
- 56.76%
- 1Y
- 134.10%
- 3Y*
- 36.05%
- 5Y*
- 21.93%
- 10Y*
- 34.75%
BWXT vs. ASML - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BWXT BWX Technologies, Inc. | 8.75% | 56.37% | 46.53% | 33.87% | 23.30% | -19.40% | -1.54% | 64.48% | -36.10% | 53.59% |
ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 64.06% | 56.51% | -7.70% | 39.91% | -30.49% | 64.13% | 66.06% | 93.56% | -9.80% | 56.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between BWXT and ASML is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2010 | 0.35 |
Fundamentals
BWXT:
$17.23B
ASML:
$674.60B
BWXT:
$3.75
ASML:
$25.86
BWXT:
49.94
ASML:
67.64
BWXT:
13.20
ASML:
4.45
BWXT:
5.10
ASML:
20.10
BWXT:
13.46
ASML:
32.39
BWXT:
$3.38B
ASML:
$33.69B
BWXT:
$566.27M
ASML:
$17.72B
BWXT:
$534.48M
ASML:
$12.99B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BWXT vs. ASML — Risk / Return Rank
BWXT
ASML
BWXT vs. ASML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BWXT | ASML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.45 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | 7.56 | -5.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.59 | 20.33 | -15.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BWXT | ASML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 3.24 | -2.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.52 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.90 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.56 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
BWXT vs. ASML - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BWXT drawdown since its inception was -47.88%, smaller than the maximum ASML drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BWXT and ASML.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BWXT | ASML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.88% | -90.00% | +42.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.42% | -17.85% | -4.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.87% | -45.38% | +12.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.92% | -56.84% | +23.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.74% | -56.84% | +9.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.27% | -0.48% | -20.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.17% | -28.14% | +14.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.89% | 6.62% | +3.27% |
Volatility
BWXT vs. ASML - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT) is 9.26%, while ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) has a volatility of 15.94%. This indicates that BWXT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BWXT | ASML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.26% | 15.94% | -6.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.52% | 33.30% | +0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.79% | 41.73% | +3.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.91% | 42.23% | -9.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.77% | 38.62% | -7.85% |
Dividends
BWXT vs. ASML - Dividend Comparison
BWXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, more than ASML's 0.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 0.50% | 0.97% | 0.97% | 0.86% | 1.27% | 0.50% | 0.50% | 1.40% | 0.94% | 0.64% | 0.92% | 0.73% |
BWXT BWX Technologies, Inc. | 0.55% | 0.58% | 0.86% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 1.26% | 1.10% | 1.67% | 0.69% | 0.91% | 30.37% |
Financials
BWXT vs. ASML - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BWX Technologies, Inc. and ASML Holding N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BWXT vs. ASML - Profitability Comparison
BWXT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BWX Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 860.22M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
ASML - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported a gross profit of 4.65B and revenue of 8.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.0%.
BWXT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BWX Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 106.69M and revenue of 860.22M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.4%.
ASML - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported an operating income of 3.16B and revenue of 8.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.0%.
BWXT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BWX Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 91.19M and revenue of 860.22M, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.
ASML - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported a net income of 2.76B and revenue of 8.77B, resulting in a net margin of 31.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BWXT and ASML have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASML has higher volatility (15.94%) compared to BWXT (9.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BWXT dropped -47.88% vs ASML's -90.00%.
ASML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BWXT and ASML
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer