BVN vs. TIGR
BVN (Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A.) and TIGR (UP Fintech Holding Limited) are both stocks. BVN operates in Other Precious Metals & Mining (Basic Materials), while TIGR operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, BVN returned 25.12%/yr vs -29.56%/yr for TIGR. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BVN vs. TIGR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BVN achieves a 11.78% return, which is significantly higher than TIGR's -51.15% return.
BVN
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -14.51%
- YTD
- 11.78%
- 6M
- 25.03%
- 1Y
- 84.69%
- 3Y*
- 65.63%
- 5Y*
- 25.12%
- 10Y*
- 11.61%
TIGR
- 1D
- 4.24%
- 1M
- -27.71%
- YTD
- -51.15%
- 6M
- -49.84%
- 1Y
- -44.67%
- 3Y*
- 13.55%
- 5Y*
- -29.56%
- 10Y*
- —
BVN vs. TIGR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BVN Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. | 11.78% | 147.96% | -24.06% | 106.47% | 2.47% | -39.95% | -19.27% | -12.49% |
TIGR UP Fintech Holding Limited | -51.15% | 47.99% | 46.15% | 29.62% | -30.55% | -38.16% | 123.66% | -67.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between BVN and TIGR is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2019 | 0.18 |
The correlation between BVN and TIGR shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BVN:
$7.68B
TIGR:
$831.15M
BVN:
$3.84
TIGR:
$0.62
BVN:
7.86
TIGR:
7.59
BVN:
0.02
TIGR:
0.09
BVN:
3.75
TIGR:
1.34
BVN:
1.85
TIGR:
0.99
BVN:
$2.05B
TIGR:
$645.56M
BVN:
$1.06B
TIGR:
$533.82M
BVN:
$1.18B
TIGR:
$236.90M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BVN vs. TIGR — Risk / Return Rank
BVN
TIGR
BVN vs. TIGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. (BVN) and UP Fintech Holding Limited (TIGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BVN | TIGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 0.91 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.78 | -0.67 | +3.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.24 | -1.35 | +8.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BVN | TIGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.71 | -0.67 | +2.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | -0.36 | +0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | -0.12 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
BVN vs. TIGR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BVN drawdown since its inception was -93.68%, roughly equal to the maximum TIGR drawdown of -93.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BVN and TIGR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BVN | TIGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.68% | -93.65% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.64% | -66.44% | +35.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.30% | -66.44% | +28.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.67% | -92.04% | +38.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.81% | -87.28% | +49.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.41% | -77.94% | +31.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.73% | 33.03% | -21.30% |
Volatility
BVN vs. TIGR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. (BVN) is 20.37%, while UP Fintech Holding Limited (TIGR) has a volatility of 35.71%. This indicates that BVN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TIGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BVN | TIGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.37% | 35.71% | -15.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.42% | 48.46% | -6.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.93% | 67.34% | -17.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.73% | 83.00% | -37.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.92% | 89.75% | -43.83% |
Dividends
BVN vs. TIGR - Dividend Comparison
BVN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, while TIGR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BVN Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. | 3.75% | 1.57% | 0.63% | 0.48% | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.58% | 0.55% | 0.60% | 0.26% |
TIGR UP Fintech Holding Limited | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
BVN vs. TIGR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. and UP Fintech Holding Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BVN vs. TIGR - Profitability Comparison
BVN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. reported a gross profit of 356.89M and revenue of 622.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.3%.
TIGR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UP Fintech Holding Limited reported a gross profit of 147.59M and revenue of 155.34M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.0%.
BVN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. reported an operating income of 325.55M and revenue of 622.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 52.3%.
TIGR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UP Fintech Holding Limited reported an operating income of 65.89M and revenue of 155.34M, resulting in an operating margin of 42.4%.
BVN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. reported a net income of 334.26M and revenue of 622.46M, resulting in a net margin of 53.7%.
TIGR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UP Fintech Holding Limited reported a net income of -26.92M and revenue of 155.34M, resulting in a net margin of -17.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BVN and TIGR have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TIGR has higher volatility (35.71%) compared to BVN (20.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BVN dropped -93.68% vs TIGR's -93.65%.
BVN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BVN and TIGR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer