BTCI vs. VTI
BTCI (NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BTCI is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Neos, while VTI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index. BTCI is actively managed, while VTI is passively managed. Over the past year, BTCI returned -34.15% vs 24.96% for VTI. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BTCI charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTI.
Performance
BTCI vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTCI achieves a -24.93% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 9.05% return.
BTCI
- 1D
- 5.05%
- 1M
- -19.01%
- YTD
- -24.93%
- 6M
- -26.93%
- 1Y
- -34.15%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTI
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 9.05%
- 6M
- 8.94%
- 1Y
- 24.96%
- 3Y*
- 21.05%
- 5Y*
- 12.25%
- 10Y*
- 14.84%
BTCI vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF | -24.93% | -1.09% | 26.12% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 9.05% | 17.10% | 1.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTCI and VTI is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2024 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTCI vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank
BTCI
VTI
BTCI vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTCI | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.36 | -0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.73 | 2.81 | -3.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.34 | 12.85 | -14.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTCI | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.87 | 2.02 | -2.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.07 | 0.50 | -0.58 |
Drawdowns
BTCI vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTCI drawdown since its inception was -47.16%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCI and VTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTCI | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.16% | -55.45% | +8.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.16% | -8.92% | -38.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.49% | -2.64% | -41.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.40% | -8.02% | -7.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.53% | 1.95% | +23.58% |
Volatility
BTCI vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) has a higher volatility of 10.95% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 3.88%. This indicates that BTCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTCI | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.95% | 3.88% | +7.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.23% | 9.55% | +21.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.57% | 12.44% | +27.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.40% | 17.44% | +22.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.40% | 18.33% | +22.07% |
BTCI vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTCI has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTCI vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
BTCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.41%, more than VTI's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF | 44.41% | 36.46% | 6.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.03% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTCI and VTI have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTCI has higher volatility (10.95%) compared to VTI (3.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTCI dropped -47.16% vs VTI's -55.45%.
On 1-year performance, VTI leads with 24.96% vs -34.15% for BTCI. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 3.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VTI has performed better with a 24.96% return vs -34.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BTCI.
BTCI has the higher dividend yield at 44.41%, compared with 1.03% for VTI.
BTCI is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Neos and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BTCI and 0.03% for VTI.
VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTCI and VTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer