BT-A.L vs. UL

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

BT-A.L (BT Group plc) and UL (The Unilever Group) are both stocks. BT-A.L operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services), while UL operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, BT-A.L returned -2.53%/yr vs 5.13%/yr for UL. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

BT-A.L vs. UL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in BT Group plc (BT-A.L) and The Unilever Group (UL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

BT-A.L is traded in GBp, while UL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the UL values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BT-A.L achieves a 11.11% return, which is significantly higher than UL's -11.90% return. Over the past 10 years, BT-A.L has underperformed UL with an annualized return of -2.53%, while UL has yielded a comparatively higher 5.13% annualized return.

BT-A.L

• 1D: 1.49%
• 1M: -13.42%
• YTD: 11.11%
• 6M: 17.09%
• 1Y: 19.68%
• 3Y*: 17.95%
• 5Y*: 7.11%
• 10Y*: -2.53%

UL

• 1D: -1.14%
• 1M: -0.94%
• YTD: -11.90%
• 6M: -8.53%
• 1Y: -17.08%
• 3Y*: 1.43%
• 5Y*: 0.94%
• 10Y*: 5.13%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BT-A.L vs. UL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BT-A.L BT Group plc	11.11%	33.10%	23.69%	17.70%	-30.23%	29.97%	-31.28%	-12.15%	-6.56%	-21.99%
UL The Unilever Group	-11.90%	-1.59%	23.01%	-5.16%	8.74%	-6.73%	5.83%	8.58%	3.46%	28.03%

Correlation

The correlation between BT-A.L and UL is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.18
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2007	0.22

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) BT-A.L : £20.36B UL : $109.27B
Gross Profit (TTM) BT-A.L : £9.54B UL : $90.89B
EBITDA (TTM) BT-A.L : £7.36B UL : $24.12B

Return for Risk

BT-A.L vs. UL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BT-A.L

BT-A.L Risk / Return Rank: 63
BT-A.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
BT-A.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
BT-A.L Omega Ratio Rank: 61
BT-A.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
BT-A.L Martin Ratio Rank: 61

UL

UL Risk / Return Rank: 10
UL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
UL Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
UL Omega Ratio Rank: 11
UL Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
UL Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BT-A.L vs. UL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BT Group plc (BT-A.L) and The Unilever Group (UL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BT-A.L	UL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.75	-0.82	+1.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.28	-1.05	+2.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	0.87	+0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.00	-0.70	+1.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.93	-1.47	+3.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BT-A.L vs. UL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BT-A.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is higher than the UL Sharpe Ratio of -0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BT-A.L and UL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BT-A.L	UL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75	-0.82	+1.57
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24	0.05	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.08	0.24	-0.32
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.12	0.39	-0.27

Drawdowns

BT-A.L vs. UL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BT-A.L drawdown since its inception was -75.45%, which is greater than UL's maximum drawdown of -34.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BT-A.L and UL.

Drawdown Indicators

	BT-A.L	UL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.45%	-34.44%	-41.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.61%	-24.55%	+4.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.74%	-24.55%	-1.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.18%	-24.55%	-18.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-71.80%	-31.72%	-40.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-34.05%	-22.67%	-11.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-36.97%	-9.11%	-27.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.19%	11.68%	-1.49%

Volatility

BT-A.L vs. UL - Volatility Comparison

BT Group plc (BT-A.L) has a higher volatility of 11.13% compared to The Unilever Group (UL) at 6.01%. This indicates that BT-A.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BT-A.L	UL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.13%	6.01%	+5.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.44%	17.98%	+2.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.27%	20.86%	+5.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.83%	19.94%	+9.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.99%	21.51%	+9.48%

Dividends

BT-A.L vs. UL - Dividend Comparison

BT-A.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, less than UL's 4.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BT-A.L BT Group plc	4.01%	4.46%	5.62%	6.23%	6.87%	1.36%	0.00%	8.00%	6.37%	5.67%	3.94%	2.73%
UL The Unilever Group	4.07%	3.51%	3.29%	3.83%	3.57%	3.77%	3.07%	3.18%	3.49%	2.80%	3.42%	3.02%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BT-A.L and UL in my portfolio?

BT-A.L and UL have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.