PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BT-A.L vs. SHEL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BT-A.L vs. SHEL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in BT Group plc (BT-A.L) and Shell plc (SHEL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BT-A.L is traded in GBp, while SHEL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SHEL values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BT-A.L achieves a 11.11% return, which is significantly lower than SHEL's 21.27% return. Over the past 10 years, BT-A.L has underperformed SHEL with an annualized return of -2.53%, while SHEL has yielded a comparatively higher 10.76% annualized return.


BT-A.L

1D
1.49%
1M
-13.42%
YTD
11.11%
6M
17.09%
1Y
19.68%
3Y*
17.95%
5Y*
7.11%
10Y*
-2.53%

SHEL

1D
1.43%
1M
6.38%
YTD
21.27%
6M
21.19%
1Y
34.10%
3Y*
16.37%
5Y*
24.40%
10Y*
10.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BT-A.L vs. SHEL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BT-A.L
BT Group plc
11.11%33.10%23.69%17.70%-30.23%29.97%-31.28%-12.15%-6.56%-21.99%
SHEL
Shell plc
21.27%13.46%0.86%14.19%52.37%35.54%-42.81%2.33%-1.73%11.15%

Correlation

The correlation between BT-A.L and SHEL is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2007

0.21

The correlation between BT-A.L and SHEL shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM)

BT-A.L:

£20.36B

SHEL:

$266.82B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BT-A.L:

£9.54B

SHEL:

$41.65B

EBITDA (TTM)

BT-A.L:

£7.36B

SHEL:

$57.44B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BT-A.L vs. SHEL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BT-A.L
BT-A.L Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
BT-A.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BT-A.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
BT-A.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
BT-A.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
BT-A.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

SHEL
SHEL Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SHEL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHEL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHEL Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
SHEL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHEL Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BT-A.L vs. SHEL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BT Group plc (BT-A.L) and Shell plc (SHEL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BT-A.LSHELDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.28

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.00

2.63

-1.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.93

7.22

-5.29

BT-A.L vs. SHEL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BT-A.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the SHEL Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BT-A.L and SHEL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BT-A.LSHELDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

1.61

-0.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

1.01

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.08

0.36

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.26

-0.14

Drawdowns

BT-A.L vs. SHEL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BT-A.L drawdown since its inception was -75.45%, which is greater than SHEL's maximum drawdown of -67.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BT-A.L and SHEL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BT-A.LSHELDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.45%

-67.04%

-8.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.61%

-13.00%

-6.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.74%

-18.89%

-6.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.18%

-20.17%

-23.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.80%

-67.04%

-4.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.05%

-7.45%

-26.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.97%

-13.36%

-23.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.19%

4.73%

+5.46%

Volatility

BT-A.L vs. SHEL - Volatility Comparison

BT Group plc (BT-A.L) has a higher volatility of 11.13% compared to Shell plc (SHEL) at 5.63%. This indicates that BT-A.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHEL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BT-A.LSHELDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.13%

5.63%

+5.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.44%

17.42%

+3.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.27%

21.36%

+4.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.83%

24.17%

+5.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.99%

29.95%

+1.04%

Dividends

BT-A.L vs. SHEL - Dividend Comparison

BT-A.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, more than SHEL's 3.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BT-A.L
BT Group plc
4.01%4.46%5.62%6.23%6.87%1.36%0.00%8.00%6.37%5.67%3.94%2.73%
SHEL
Shell plc
3.41%3.90%4.39%3.76%3.48%3.78%5.69%6.27%6.27%2.75%6.49%8.17%

Financials

BT-A.L vs. SHEL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BT Group plc and Shell plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B20222023202420252026
5.12B
69.57B
(BT-A.L) Total Revenue
(SHEL) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BT-A.L values in GBp, SHEL values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


BT-A.L and SHEL have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BT-A.L and SHEL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer