BT-A.L vs. MNG.L
BT-A.L (BT Group plc) and MNG.L (M&G plc) are both stocks. BT-A.L operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services), while MNG.L operates in Asset Management (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, BT-A.L returned 7.11%/yr vs 15.06%/yr for MNG.L. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BT-A.L vs. MNG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BT-A.L achieves a 11.11% return, which is significantly lower than MNG.L's 14.56% return.
BT-A.L
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- -13.42%
- YTD
- 11.11%
- 6M
- 17.09%
- 1Y
- 19.68%
- 3Y*
- 17.95%
- 5Y*
- 7.11%
- 10Y*
- -2.53%
MNG.L
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 3.50%
- YTD
- 14.56%
- 6M
- 20.35%
- 1Y
- 38.16%
- 3Y*
- 26.25%
- 5Y*
- 15.06%
- 10Y*
- —
BT-A.L vs. MNG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BT-A.L BT Group plc | 11.11% | 33.10% | 23.69% | 17.70% | -30.23% | 29.97% | -31.28% | -4.51% |
MNG.L M&G plc | 14.56% | 58.44% | -2.67% | 31.17% | 2.51% | 9.91% | -11.33% | 7.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between BT-A.L and MNG.L is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2019 | 0.31 |
The correlation between BT-A.L and MNG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BT-A.L:
£20.36B
MNG.L:
£27.20B
BT-A.L:
£9.54B
MNG.L:
£28.73B
BT-A.L:
£7.36B
MNG.L:
£2.40B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BT-A.L vs. MNG.L — Risk / Return Rank
BT-A.L
MNG.L
BT-A.L vs. MNG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BT Group plc (BT-A.L) and M&G plc (MNG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BT-A.L | MNG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.37 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | 3.24 | -2.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.93 | 11.56 | -9.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BT-A.L | MNG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 | 2.08 | -1.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.63 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.41 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
BT-A.L vs. MNG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BT-A.L drawdown since its inception was -75.45%, which is greater than MNG.L's maximum drawdown of -62.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BT-A.L and MNG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BT-A.L | MNG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.45% | -62.75% | -12.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.61% | -11.72% | -7.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.74% | -18.34% | -7.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.18% | -27.30% | -15.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.05% | -0.92% | -33.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.97% | -10.47% | -26.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.19% | 3.29% | +6.90% |
Volatility
BT-A.L vs. MNG.L - Volatility Comparison
BT Group plc (BT-A.L) has a higher volatility of 11.13% compared to M&G plc (MNG.L) at 4.96%. This indicates that BT-A.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BT-A.L | MNG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.13% | 4.96% | +6.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.44% | 14.64% | +5.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.27% | 18.33% | +7.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.83% | 24.10% | +5.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.99% | 36.63% | -5.64% |
Dividends
BT-A.L vs. MNG.L - Dividend Comparison
BT-A.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, less than MNG.L's 6.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BT-A.L BT Group plc | 4.01% | 4.46% | 5.62% | 6.23% | 6.87% | 1.36% | 0.00% | 8.00% | 6.37% | 5.67% | 3.94% | 2.73% |
MNG.L M&G plc | 6.55% | 7.05% | 10.01% | 8.95% | 9.80% | 9.19% | 4.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
BT-A.L vs. MNG.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BT Group plc and M&G plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
BT-A.L and MNG.L have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for BT-A.L and MNG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer