PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BT-A.L vs. ABF.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BT-A.L vs. ABF.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in BT Group plc (BT-A.L) and Associated British Foods plc (ABF.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BT-A.L achieves a 11.11% return, which is significantly higher than ABF.L's -11.43% return. Over the past 10 years, BT-A.L has underperformed ABF.L with an annualized return of -2.53%, while ABF.L has yielded a comparatively higher -2.11% annualized return.


BT-A.L

1D
1.49%
1M
-13.42%
YTD
11.11%
6M
17.09%
1Y
19.68%
3Y*
17.95%
5Y*
7.11%
10Y*
-2.53%

ABF.L

1D
-0.05%
1M
3.51%
YTD
-11.43%
6M
-9.51%
1Y
-6.56%
3Y*
3.45%
5Y*
-1.61%
10Y*
-2.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BT-A.L vs. ABF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BT-A.L
BT Group plc
11.11%33.10%23.69%17.70%-30.23%29.97%-31.28%-12.15%-6.56%-21.99%
ABF.L
Associated British Foods plc
-11.43%7.28%-10.17%54.26%-19.40%-9.43%-12.86%29.56%-26.12%4.19%

Correlation

The correlation between BT-A.L and ABF.L is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2006

0.33

Over the past year, the correlation between BT-A.L and ABF.L has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.33, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM)

BT-A.L:

£20.36B

ABF.L:

£39.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BT-A.L:

£9.54B

ABF.L:

£3.18B

EBITDA (TTM)

BT-A.L:

£7.36B

ABF.L:

£4.95B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BT-A.L vs. ABF.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BT-A.L
BT-A.L Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
BT-A.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BT-A.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
BT-A.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
BT-A.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
BT-A.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

ABF.L
ABF.L Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
ABF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
ABF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BT-A.L vs. ABF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BT Group plc (BT-A.L) and Associated British Foods plc (ABF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BT-A.LABF.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

0.97

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.00

-0.28

+1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.93

-0.50

+2.43

BT-A.L vs. ABF.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BT-A.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is higher than the ABF.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BT-A.L and ABF.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BT-A.LABF.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

-0.25

+1.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

-0.06

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.08

-0.08

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.24

-0.12

Drawdowns

BT-A.L vs. ABF.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BT-A.L drawdown since its inception was -75.45%, which is greater than ABF.L's maximum drawdown of -61.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BT-A.L and ABF.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BT-A.LABF.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.45%

-61.94%

-13.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.61%

-23.21%

+3.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.74%

-31.10%

+5.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.18%

-46.34%

+3.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.80%

-60.35%

-11.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.05%

-34.97%

+0.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.97%

-19.70%

-17.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.19%

13.06%

-2.87%

Volatility

BT-A.L vs. ABF.L - Volatility Comparison

BT Group plc (BT-A.L) has a higher volatility of 11.13% compared to Associated British Foods plc (ABF.L) at 5.62%. This indicates that BT-A.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BT-A.LABF.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.13%

5.62%

+5.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.44%

19.86%

+0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.27%

26.22%

+0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.83%

25.69%

+4.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.99%

28.04%

+2.95%

Dividends

BT-A.L vs. ABF.L - Dividend Comparison

BT-A.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, more than ABF.L's 3.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABF.L
Associated British Foods plc
3.38%2.96%4.41%2.53%2.77%2.02%0.00%1.78%2.20%1.45%1.34%1.05%
BT-A.L
BT Group plc
4.01%4.46%5.62%6.23%6.87%1.36%0.00%8.00%6.37%5.67%3.94%2.73%

Financials

BT-A.L vs. ABF.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BT Group plc and Associated British Foods plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B6.00B7.00B8.00B9.00B10.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
5.12B
9.47B
(BT-A.L) Total Revenue
(ABF.L) Total Revenue
Values in GBp except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


BT-A.L and ABF.L have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BT-A.L and ABF.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer