PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSV vs. BIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSV vs. BIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSV achieves a 0.10% return, which is significantly higher than BIV's -0.67% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BSV having a 1.91% annualized return and BIV not far behind at 1.83%.


BSV

1D
-0.01%
1M
-0.38%
YTD
0.10%
6M
0.53%
1Y
3.66%
3Y*
4.42%
5Y*
1.57%
10Y*
1.91%

BIV

1D
-0.05%
1M
-0.94%
YTD
-0.67%
6M
-0.33%
1Y
4.70%
3Y*
4.27%
5Y*
0.08%
10Y*
1.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSV vs. BIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BSV
Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares
0.10%6.00%3.78%4.90%-5.49%-1.09%4.70%4.98%1.34%1.20%
BIV
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF
-0.67%8.52%1.57%6.07%-13.21%-2.40%9.67%10.34%-0.19%3.65%

Correlation

The correlation between BSV and BIV is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2007

0.79

The correlation between BSV and BIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (all time) to 0.94 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSV vs. BIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSV
BSV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
BSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSV Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
BSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSV Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

BIV
BIV Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
BIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIV Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
BIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIV Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSV vs. BIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSVBIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.21

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

1.49

+1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.83

4.40

+5.43

BSV vs. BIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSV Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is higher than the BIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSV and BIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSVBIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

1.18

+0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.01

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.33

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.64

+0.21

Drawdowns

BSV vs. BIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSV drawdown since its inception was -8.54%, smaller than the maximum BIV drawdown of -18.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSV and BIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSVBIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.54%

-18.95%

+10.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.29%

-3.18%

+1.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.53%

-6.07%

+4.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.54%

-18.74%

+10.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.54%

-18.95%

+10.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

-2.46%

+1.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.97%

-3.39%

+2.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.37%

1.07%

-0.70%

Volatility

BSV vs. BIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV) is 0.54%, while Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV) has a volatility of 1.35%. This indicates that BSV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSVBIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.54%

1.35%

-0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.28%

2.93%

-1.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79%

4.00%

-2.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.73%

6.40%

-3.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.38%

5.51%

-3.13%

BSV vs. BIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BSV and BIV have an expense ratio of 0.03%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BSV vs. BIV - Dividend Comparison

BSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, less than BIV's 4.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIV
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF
4.24%4.01%3.79%3.09%2.41%3.42%2.95%2.75%2.88%2.69%3.01%3.02%
BSV
Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares
4.00%3.83%3.38%2.46%1.50%1.45%1.79%2.29%1.99%1.65%1.48%1.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, BSV and BIV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BIV has higher volatility (1.35%) compared to BSV (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSV dropped -8.54% vs BIV's -18.95%.

On 10-year performance, BSV leads with 1.91% vs 1.83% for BIV. Both ETFs have the same 0.03% expense ratio. On volatility, BSV has been the lower-risk option at 0.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, BSV has performed better with a 1.91% return vs 1.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BSV and BIV have the same expense ratio: 0.03% per year.

BIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.24%, compared with 4.00% for BSV.

BSV is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while BIV is Intermediate Core Bond. BSV tracks Bloomberg U.S. 1–5 Year Government/Credit Float Adjusted Index, while BIV tracks Bloomberg U.S. 5–10 Year Government/Credit Float Adjusted Bond Index.

BSV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSV and BIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer