PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRZU vs. CAOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BRZU vs. CAOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares (BRZU) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRZU achieves a 5.84% return, which is significantly higher than CAOS's 0.81% return.


BRZU

1D
-1.65%
1M
-26.61%
YTD
5.84%
6M
6.23%
1Y
46.00%
3Y*
3.57%
5Y*
-4.83%
10Y*
-16.53%

CAOS

1D
-0.09%
1M
-0.08%
YTD
0.81%
6M
0.65%
1Y
1.88%
3Y*
4.15%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRZU vs. CAOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BRZU
Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares
5.84%97.99%-57.07%62.53%
CAOS
Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF
0.81%2.55%5.33%7.97%

Correlation

The correlation between BRZU and CAOS is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2023

-0.02

The correlation between BRZU and CAOS shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to -0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BRZU vs. CAOS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BRZU
CAOS

Financial Services

32.7%
12.4%

Energy

18.7%
4.1%

Basic Materials

13.7%
1.9%

Utilities

12.8%
2.6%

Industrials

10.9%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
5.4%

Healthcare

2.4%
9.6%

Communication Services

2.2%
10.4%

Consumer Cyclical

1.5%
10.0%

Technology

0.9%
33.1%

Real Estate

-

2.0%

Financial Services

BRZU
32.7%
CAOS
12.4%

Energy

BRZU
18.7%
CAOS
4.1%

Basic Materials

BRZU
13.7%
CAOS
1.9%

Utilities

BRZU
12.8%
CAOS
2.6%

Industrials

BRZU
10.9%
CAOS
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

BRZU
4.2%
CAOS
5.4%

Healthcare

BRZU
2.4%
CAOS
9.6%

Communication Services

BRZU
2.2%
CAOS
10.4%

Consumer Cyclical

BRZU
1.5%
CAOS
10.0%

Technology

BRZU
0.9%
CAOS
33.1%

Real Estate

BRZU

-

CAOS
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRZU vs. CAOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRZU
BRZU Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
BRZU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRZU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRZU Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
BRZU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRZU Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

CAOS
CAOS Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
CAOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAOS Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
CAOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAOS Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRZU vs. CAOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares (BRZU) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BRZUCAOSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.25

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

2.49

-1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.08

6.17

-2.08

BRZU vs. CAOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRZU Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is comparable to the CAOS Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRZU and CAOS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BRZUCAOSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

1.23

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.35

1.21

-1.56

Drawdowns

BRZU vs. CAOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRZU drawdown since its inception was -99.71%, which is greater than CAOS's maximum drawdown of -3.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRZU and CAOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRZUCAOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.71%

-3.60%

-96.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.97%

-0.76%

-35.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.25%

-3.60%

-54.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-65.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.24%

-1.08%

-98.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-89.56%

-0.90%

-88.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.30%

0.31%

+10.99%

Volatility

BRZU vs. CAOS - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares (BRZU) has a higher volatility of 14.82% compared to Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS) at 0.29%. This indicates that BRZU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRZUCAOSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.82%

0.29%

+14.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.71%

1.04%

+40.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.91%

1.53%

+48.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.42%

4.25%

+51.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

83.03%

4.25%

+78.78%

BRZU vs. CAOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRZU has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than CAOS's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

BRZU vs. CAOS - Dividend Comparison

BRZU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, while CAOS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BRZU
Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares
2.52%2.39%8.73%3.24%4.70%6.29%0.78%0.95%1.04%0.74%
CAOS
Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BRZU and CAOS have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRZU has higher volatility (14.82%) compared to CAOS (0.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRZU dropped -99.71% vs CAOS's -3.60%.

On 3-year performance, CAOS leads with 4.15% vs 3.57% for BRZU. On fees, CAOS is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, CAOS has been the lower-risk option at 0.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, CAOS has performed better with a 4.15% return vs 3.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CAOS is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for BRZU.

BRZU has the higher dividend yield at 2.52%, compared with 0.00% for CAOS.

BRZU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while CAOS is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for BRZU and 0.63% for CAOS.

CAOS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRZU and CAOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer