PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRO vs. BIP-UN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BRO vs. BIP-UN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown & Brown, Inc. (BRO) and Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P (BIP-UN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BRO is traded in USD, while BIP-UN.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the BIP-UN.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRO achieves a -26.85% return, which is significantly lower than BIP-UN.TO's 13.82% return. Over the past 10 years, BRO has underperformed BIP-UN.TO with an annualized return of 13.27%, while BIP-UN.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 28.77% annualized return.


BRO

1D
-1.46%
1M
3.05%
YTD
-26.85%
6M
-24.91%
1Y
-47.08%
3Y*
-2.56%
5Y*
3.04%
10Y*
13.27%

BIP-UN.TO

1D
-0.39%
1M
6.39%
YTD
13.82%
6M
12.37%
1Y
20.99%
3Y*
7.00%
5Y*
14.92%
10Y*
28.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRO vs. BIP-UN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BRO
Brown & Brown, Inc.
-26.85%-21.37%44.32%25.73%-18.39%49.31%21.06%44.67%8.30%16.15%
BIP-UN.TO
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P
13.82%15.30%6.27%7.08%20.25%27.91%17.32%52.53%-17.94%42.93%

Correlation

The correlation between BRO and BIP-UN.TO is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2009

0.17

The correlation between BRO and BIP-UN.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.19 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

BRO:

$4.76

BIP-UN.TO:

CA$0.91

PE Ratio

BRO:

12.18

BIP-UN.TO:

59.66

PEG Ratio

BRO:

0.89

BIP-UN.TO:

0.31

PS Ratio

BRO:

2.18

BIP-UN.TO:

1.04

Total Revenue (TTM)

BRO:

$6.43B

BIP-UN.TO:

CA$24.01B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BRO:

$3.82B

BIP-UN.TO:

CA$6.49B

EBITDA (TTM)

BRO:

$1.51B

BIP-UN.TO:

CA$11.14B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRO vs. BIP-UN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRO
BRO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRO Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
BRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRO Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

BIP-UN.TO
BIP-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
BIP-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIP-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIP-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
BIP-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIP-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRO vs. BIP-UN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown & Brown, Inc. (BRO) and Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P (BIP-UN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BROBIP-UN.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.69

1.20

-0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.93

1.75

-2.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.59

3.79

-5.39

BRO vs. BIP-UN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRO Sharpe Ratio is -1.66, which is lower than the BIP-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRO and BIP-UN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BROBIP-UN.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.66

1.15

-2.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.45

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.74

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.90

-0.40

Drawdowns

BRO vs. BIP-UN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRO drawdown since its inception was -55.85%, which is greater than BIP-UN.TO's maximum drawdown of -51.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRO and BIP-UN.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BROBIP-UN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.85%

-51.41%

-4.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.55%

-12.06%

-38.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.85%

-41.17%

-14.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.85%

-47.89%

-7.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.85%

-51.41%

-4.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.91%

-1.52%

-51.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.52%

-7.80%

-5.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.57%

5.55%

+24.02%

Volatility

BRO vs. BIP-UN.TO - Volatility Comparison

Brown & Brown, Inc. (BRO) has a higher volatility of 9.52% compared to Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P (BIP-UN.TO) at 4.78%. This indicates that BRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIP-UN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BROBIP-UN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.52%

4.78%

+4.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.90%

14.26%

+7.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.53%

18.41%

+10.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.81%

33.34%

-8.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.69%

38.92%

-15.23%

Dividends

BRO vs. BIP-UN.TO - Dividend Comparison

BRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, less than BIP-UN.TO's 4.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIP-UN.TO
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P
4.51%5.04%4.85%5.00%4.23%3.97%5.61%5.62%6.65%5.64%5.16%10.13%
BRO
Brown & Brown, Inc.
1.11%0.77%0.53%0.67%0.74%0.54%0.73%0.82%1.11%1.08%1.12%1.41%

Financials

BRO vs. BIP-UN.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brown & Brown, Inc. and Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
1.90B
6.30B
(BRO) Total Revenue
(BIP-UN.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BRO values in USD, BIP-UN.TO values in CAD

BRO vs. BIP-UN.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Brown & Brown, Inc. and Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
52.3%
26.9%
Portfolio components
BRO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brown & Brown, Inc. reported a gross profit of 994.00M and revenue of 1.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.3%.

BIP-UN.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P reported a gross profit of 1.70B and revenue of 6.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.9%.

BRO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brown & Brown, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 1.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

BIP-UN.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P reported an operating income of 1.59B and revenue of 6.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.2%.

BRO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brown & Brown, Inc. reported a net income of 426.00M and revenue of 1.90B, resulting in a net margin of 22.4%.

BIP-UN.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P reported a net income of -86.00M and revenue of 6.30B, resulting in a net margin of -1.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BRO and BIP-UN.TO have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRO and BIP-UN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer