BRLN vs. VTV
BRLN (BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF) and VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BRLN is a Bank Loan fund actively managed by BlackRock, while VTV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. BRLN is actively managed, while VTV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BRLN returned 7.18%/yr vs 17.72%/yr for VTV. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BRLN charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VTV.
Performance
BRLN vs. VTV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BRLN achieves a 1.14% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 11.91% return.
BRLN
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 1.14%
- 6M
- 1.72%
- 1Y
- 4.81%
- 3Y*
- 7.18%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTV
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 2.67%
- YTD
- 11.91%
- 6M
- 13.41%
- 1Y
- 25.49%
- 3Y*
- 17.72%
- 5Y*
- 11.30%
- 10Y*
- 12.42%
BRLN vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRLN BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF | 1.14% | 5.38% | 7.49% | 13.42% | 2.13% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 11.91% | 15.27% | 15.95% | 9.32% | 10.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between BRLN and VTV is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2022 | 0.16 |
The correlation between BRLN and VTV shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.17 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BRLN vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank
BRLN
VTV
BRLN vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF (BRLN) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BRLN | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.45 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 4.03 | -1.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.32 | 15.20 | -5.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BRLN | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.54 | 2.52 | -0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.16 | 0.51 | +1.64 |
Drawdowns
BRLN vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRLN drawdown since its inception was -3.85%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRLN and VTV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BRLN | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.85% | -59.27% | +55.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.00% | -6.35% | +4.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.85% | -14.52% | +10.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.42% | -1.11% | +0.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.31% | -7.87% | +7.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.52% | 1.68% | -1.16% |
Volatility
BRLN vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF (BRLN) is 1.11%, while Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) has a volatility of 2.65%. This indicates that BRLN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BRLN | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.11% | 2.65% | -1.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.34% | 7.67% | -5.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.14% | 10.18% | -7.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.74% | 13.89% | -10.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.74% | 16.68% | -12.94% |
BRLN vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison
BRLN has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
BRLN vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison
BRLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.37%, more than VTV's 1.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRLN BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF | 6.37% | 6.50% | 7.87% | 9.06% | 1.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 1.87% | 2.05% | 2.31% | 2.46% | 2.52% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 2.50% | 2.73% | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BRLN and VTV have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VTV has higher volatility (2.65%) compared to BRLN (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRLN dropped -3.85% vs VTV's -59.27%.
On 3-year performance, VTV leads with 17.72% vs 7.18% for BRLN. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BRLN has been the lower-risk option at 1.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VTV has performed better with a 17.72% return vs 7.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for BRLN.
BRLN has the higher dividend yield at 6.37%, compared with 1.87% for VTV.
BRLN is categorized as Bank Loan, while VTV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for BRLN and 0.04% for VTV.
VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BRLN and VTV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer