BRK-B vs. IBIT
BRK-B (Berkshire Hathaway Inc.) is a stock, while IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) is Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Over the past year, BRK-B returned -1.32% vs -39.44% for IBIT. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BRK-B vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BRK-B achieves a -3.11% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -27.71% return.
BRK-B
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 2.32%
- YTD
- -3.11%
- 6M
- -2.06%
- 1Y
- -1.32%
- 3Y*
- 13.25%
- 5Y*
- 11.03%
- 10Y*
- 13.14%
IBIT
- 1D
- 5.13%
- 1M
- -21.03%
- YTD
- -27.71%
- 6M
- -30.34%
- 1Y
- -39.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BRK-B vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BRK-B Berkshire Hathaway Inc. | -3.11% | 10.89% | 23.20% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | -27.71% | -6.41% | 89.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between BRK-B and IBIT is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024 | 0.06 |
The correlation between BRK-B and IBIT shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BRK-B vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank
BRK-B
IBIT
BRK-B vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BRK-B | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 0.86 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.14 | -0.76 | +0.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.30 | -1.36 | +1.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BRK-B | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 | -0.90 | +0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.26 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
BRK-B vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRK-B drawdown since its inception was -53.86%, roughly equal to the maximum IBIT drawdown of -52.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRK-B and IBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BRK-B | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.86% | -52.11% | -1.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.42% | -52.11% | +42.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.78% | -49.66% | +39.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.07% | -16.19% | +5.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.49% | 28.97% | -24.48% |
Volatility
BRK-B vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) is 3.98%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 11.85%. This indicates that BRK-B experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BRK-B | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.98% | 11.85% | -7.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.87% | 34.60% | -23.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.38% | 44.28% | -29.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.13% | 50.32% | -33.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.44% | 50.32% | -30.88% |
Dividends
BRK-B vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison
Neither BRK-B nor IBIT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BRK-B and IBIT have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBIT has higher volatility (11.85%) compared to BRK-B (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRK-B dropped -53.86% vs IBIT's -52.11%.
BRK-B currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.09 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BRK-B and IBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer